Skip to main content
USNI Logo USNI Logo USNI Logo
Donate
  • Cart
  • Join or Log In
  • Search

Main navigation

  • About Us
  • Membership
  • Books & Press
  • USNI News
  • Proceedings
  • Naval History
  • Archives
  • Events
  • Donate
USNI Logo USNI Logo USNI Logo
Donate
  • Cart
  • Join or Log In
  • Search

Main navigation (Sticky)

  • About Us
  • Membership
  • Books & Press
  • USNI News
  • Proceedings
  • Naval History
  • Archives
  • Events
  • Donate

Sub Menu

  • Essay Contests
    • About Essay Contests
    • Innovation for Sea Power
    • Marine Corps
    • Naval Intelligence
  • Current Issue
  • The Proceedings Podcast
  • American Sea Power Project
  • Contact Proceedings
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Media Inquiries
  • All Issues
The Warner Center at Marine Corps University, Quantico, Virginia. A 2023 survey found that while most officers felt that their professional military education experience prepared them for their next assignment, a slight majority felt it was not adequate to prepare them for high-end warfighting.
The Warner Center at Marine Corps University, Quantico, Virginia. A 2023 survey found that while most officers felt that their professional military education experience prepared them for their next assignment, a slight majority felt it was not adequate to prepare them for high-end warfighting.
U.S. Marine Corps (Kathy Reesey)

Sub Menu

  • Essay Contests
    • About Essay Contests
    • Innovation for Sea Power
    • Marine Corps
    • Naval Intelligence
  • Current Issue
  • The Proceedings Podcast
  • American Sea Power Project
  • Contact Proceedings
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Media Inquiries
  • All Issues

Preparing the Fleet for the Next Fight: An Assessment of Navy and Marine Corps Command and Staff Courses

By Major Maxwell Stewart, U.S. Marine Corps, Captain Louis Gilbertson, U.S. Marine Corps Reserve, and Mason Evers
November 2023
Proceedings
Vol. 149/11/1,449
Special
View Issue
Comments

In recent years, the officer professional military education (PME) enterprise has been accused of not adequately preparing U.S. military officers for the challenges of the modern operating environment. The most common refrain, and one directly asserted in the 2018 National Defense Strategy, is that PME stagnated during the global war on terror years, during which operational requirements focused on low-intensity counterinsurgency and stability operations. Some argue that this shift in focus came at the expense of core warfighting competencies, with PME institutions devaluing instruction related to operational warfare, military history, and combined arms. With the reemergence of great power competition and the increased possibility of great power war, the debate has shifted from a niche topic to a core national security issue.

Over a nine-month period, a George Washington University–based research team worked in collaboration with a variety of service PME stakeholders to assess whether U.S. Navy and Marine Corps intermediate-level school (ILS) PME programs are preparing officers for their follow-on assignments and for the requirements of multidomain, joint, high-end warfighting. The research incorporated both qualitative and quantitative methods to identify trends, determine causality, and develop realistic and actionable recommendations for PME program improvements. What follows is the result of more than 20 interviews with a range of stakeholders, including leaders in the fleet and current and former ILS PME faculty and staff, and the analysis derived from the survey feedback of 96 Navy and Marine Corps officers who have completed ILS PME.

Command and Staff Graduate Student Survey Feedback

The analysis of survey feedback found that while most officers felt that their PME experience prepared them for their next assignment, a slight majority felt it was not adequate to prepare them for high-end warfighting. One Marine Corps respondent stated that “there were times the curriculum was beneficial and forced folks to think through problems, however, it did not breed a warfighting mentality.” Another respondent stated that “warfighting functions focused primarily on maneuver and fires with minimal integration of information, intelligence, and non-lethal [capabilities].”

The surveys also provided other insights. For example, staff officers found it more beneficial than commanders; resident students demonstrated more polarizing perspectives while nonresident students were generally satisfied; and students who took electives directly related to their projected follow-on assignments found their overall PME experience to be more beneficial than those who did not.

Members of the Marine Innovation Unit conducts annual training at Marine Corps Base Quantico, Virginia. In recent years, the officer professional military education has been criticized as not adequately preparing U.S. military officers for the modern operating environment.
Members of the Marine Innovation Unit conducts annual training at Marine Corps Base Quantico, Virginia. In recent years, the officer professional military education has been criticized as not adequately preparing U.S. military officers for the modern operating environment. U.S. Marine Corps (Joaquin Dela Torre)

Fleet Officer Senior Leader Interview Responses

While the data drawn from the 96 PME graduates was compelling, the research team spoke with three active-duty Navy captains and three Marine Corps colonels to get their perspective on the performance and quality of PME-complete O-4s. When asked if they believed Command and Staff College (CSC) prepared the O-4s they now lead for their assignments, all six respondents said it did, albeit with varying levels of enthusiasm. The consensus among the O-6s was that, while not perfect, PME provided an important baseline for officers to understand their roles and responsibilities in O-4 billets.

When asked if they had different expectations of officers who were “PME-complete” and those who were not, or those who completed PME through resident or nonresident programs, all answered that the expectations remained the same. Nonetheless, when asked if they thought CSC was preparing their officers for the requirements of high-end warfighting, all six said it was not. One O-6 invoked the years between World Wars I and II, responding, “U.S. admirals were prepared for World War II’s battle in the Pacific because they had all studied War Plan Orange while attending the [Naval War College] earlier in their career.”

Faculty Interview Responses

Overall, current and former Naval War College faculty members interviewed said the Navy is effectively preparing officers for future competition; however, external influences, an insulated approach to warfighting, and a talent management culture that undervalues PME challenges its ability to properly prepare officers for the future fight. Similarly, interviews with current and former faculty members at Marine Corps University reported that the Marine Corps is effectively preparing its students and meeting its program outcomes; however, its limited time, resources, and subject matter expertise challenge the development of expert, all-domain, joint warfighters. Ultimately, the interviewees emphasized that putting the responsibility on PME as the determining factor in whether U.S. officers are fully prepared for all the challenges and requirements of a near-peer conflict is unrealistic and misunderstands the role of ILS PME.

Recommendations

The research team recommends the following to ensure Navy and Marine Corps officers are properly prepared for their follow-on assignments and for the requirements of multidomain, joint, high-end warfighting:

• The Navy should target unrestricted line officers for ILS PME participation.

• The Marine Corps should align its PME programs’ exercise schedules.

• The Marine Corps should increase its PME programs’ faculty subject matter expertise.

• The Navy and Marine Corps should conduct classified wargames at resident PME.

• The Navy and Marine Corps should conduct an elective audit.

• The Navy and Marine Corps should end fully remote (asynchronous) nonresident PME.

• The Joint Staff should standardize PME requirements.

The next U.S. conflict is likely to emerge rapidly and require combat-ready leaders in the first minutes of crisis. Once conflict begins, there will not be time to reexamine whether the established PME enterprise is properly preparing officers in the core warfighting competencies they will need in the modern operating environment.

Major Maxwell Stewart, U.S. Marine Corps

Major Stewart is a combat engineer officer with experience serving in both I and III Marine Expeditionary Force as well as a tour at Plans, Policies, and Operations, Headquarters Marine Corps. He is a graduate of the George Washington University’s Elliott School of International Affairs with a master’s degree in security policy studies.

More Stories From This Author View Biography

Captain Louis Gilbertson, U.S. Marine Corps Reserve

More Stories From This Author View Biography

Mason Evers

Mr. Evers is a senior consultant at Booz Allen Hamilton, where he supports the Marine Corps’ International Affairs Branch. He is a graduate of the George Washington University’s Elliott School of International Affairs with a master’s degree in security policy studies.

More Stories From This Author View Biography

Related Articles

The Warner Center at Marine Corps University, Quantico, Virginia. A 2023 survey found that while most officers felt that their professional military education experience prepared them for their next assignment, a slight majority felt it was not adequate to prepare them for high-end warfighting.
P Special

Preparing the Fleet for the Next Fight: An Assessment of Navy and Marine Corps Command and Staff Courses

By Major Maxwell Stewart, U.S. Marine Corps, Captain Louis Gilbertson, U.S. Marine Corps Reserve, and Mason Evers
November 2023
The next U.S. conflict is likely to emerge rapidly and require combat-ready leaders in the first minutes of crisis.
Senior course students at the Naval War College
Now Hear This

Leverage the Joint Intellectual Capacity of Senior PME

By Colonel Heather Levy, U.S. Army
June 2022
Senior War College curricula should be tailored to support component commanders’ operational and strategic planning objectives.
Officers
P Nobody Asked Me, But . . .

Rethink Primary PME

By Lieutenant Matt Little, U.S. Navy
April 2021
The primary PME curriculum should foster purpose-driven conversations between officers and their superiors and among officers of different warfare areas.

Quicklinks

Footer menu

  • About the Naval Institute
  • Books & Press
  • Naval History
  • USNI News
  • Proceedings
  • Oral Histories
  • Events
  • Naval Institute Foundation
  • Photos & Historical Prints
  • Advertise With Us
  • Naval Institute Archives

Receive the Newsletter

Sign up to get updates about new releases and event invitations.

Sign Up Now
Example NewsletterPrivacy Policy
USNI Logo White
Copyright © 2025 U.S. Naval Institute Privacy PolicyTerms of UseContact UsAdvertise With UsFAQContent LicenseMedia Inquiries
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
Powered by Unleashed Technologies
×

You've read 1 out of 5 free articles of Proceedings this month.

Non-members can read five free Proceedings articles per month. Join now and never hit a limit.