Skip to main content
USNI Logo USNI Logo USNI Logo
Donate
  • Cart
  • Join or Log In
  • Search

Main navigation

  • About Us
  • Membership
  • Books & Press
  • USNI News
  • Proceedings
  • Naval History
  • Archives
  • Events
  • Donate
USNI Logo USNI Logo USNI Logo
Donate
  • Cart
  • Join or Log In
  • Search

Main navigation (Sticky)

  • About Us
  • Membership
  • Books & Press
  • USNI News
  • Proceedings
  • Naval History
  • Archives
  • Events
  • Donate

Sub Menu

  • Essay Contests
    • About Essay Contests
    • Innovation for Sea Power
    • Marine Corps
    • Naval Intelligence
  • Current Issue
  • The Proceedings Podcast
  • American Sea Power Project
  • Contact Proceedings
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Media Inquiries
  • All Issues
laboratory

Sub Menu

  • Essay Contests
    • About Essay Contests
    • Innovation for Sea Power
    • Marine Corps
    • Naval Intelligence
  • Current Issue
  • The Proceedings Podcast
  • American Sea Power Project
  • Contact Proceedings
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Media Inquiries
  • All Issues

Bioweapons and Smear Campaigns–Buckle Up for the Future of Warfare

By Bill Hamblet
June 2021
Proceedings
Vol. 147/6/1,420
Editor's Page
View Issue
Comments

A little over a year ago, an outbreak of COVID-19 on board the USS Theodore Roosevelt (CVN-71) made frontline news around the world. In this issue, the winner of our Emerging and Disruptive Technology Essay Contest (sponsored by MITRE) previews what could be coming in the realm of biological warfare. Michael Knutzen’s “Synthetic Bioweapons Are Coming” addresses the advances in genetic engineering made possible by the “clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat” technique—otherwise known as “CRISPR-Cas9.” This technique was first harnessed for genetic editing in 2013. Compared with earlier techniques it is cheaper, faster, and more accurate—a development likened to replacing vacuum tubes with transistors in early computers. How much faster and cheaper? One 2019 winner of the International Genetically Engineered Machine competition was a team of high school students who used CRISPR-Cas9 to engineer E. coli bacteria to spin spider silk. Think about that for a second. My high school biology team dissected frogs! Knutzen delves into the possibilities of adversary bioscientists (not teenagers) genetically engineering weapons that could make the COVID-19 outbreak on the Theodore Roosevelt look like an easy day for a ship’s medical team.   

The winner of this year’s Information Warfare Essay Contest (sponsored by Booz Allen Hamilton) is Army Captain Don Gomez. Foreign and domestic “bots” and “trolls” have waged social media campaigns to influence elections, but what would happen if social media tools were turned against military leaders just when their word, opinion, or report was most important? In “Canceled in Combat: Get Ready for Smear War,” Captain Gomez writes, “ U.S. military leaders have no qualms accepting that adversaries are willing to kill [them] to meet their objectives. It should be no surprise that they would be willing to smear them to do the same.” Imagine fake emails from the commanding officer of a ship showing him to be critical of senior leaders or a “deepfake” video showing a general in a compromising situation—such easy-to-produce smears could undermine confidence in the force at exactly the wrong time.

Naval War College Professor John Maurer penned this month’s American Sea Power Project article. In “Classic Works on Sea Power Have Enduring Value," Maurer compares and contrasts the contributions of Alfred Thayer Mahan and Sir Julian Corbett to the literary canon of naval strategy. Not only is this a great review of the classics if you haven’t read them in a while, but Maurer also highlights the role of Mahan in China’s current naval strategy and how the United States and its allies can apply Corbett’s lessons to counter that strategy. This is another salient essay that I wish I had been able to read when I was a junior officer.

Finally, the ongoing debate about supercarriers and light carriers continues to play out in our pages and in the budget deals and compromises between the Department of the Navy and Congress. If you’re looking for historical context, Navy Lieutenant Commander Andrew Rucker’s “The Little Carriers That Could” is a great read. In this 3rd-prize-winning essay from the 2020 CNO Naval History Contest (sponsored by General Dynamics), Rucker writes that the Independence-class light carriers “did not quite live up to the Navy’s ideal for a carrier design, [but] they had the virtue of being present and ready to fight as the United States went on the offensive against Japan.” No doubt there is a lesson for today’s Navy.

Until next month, let the debate continue and stay healthy.

Bill H Photo
Bill Hamblet Executive Page Photo

Bill Hamblet

Captain Hamblet is the Executive Vice President for Periodicals and Membership at the U.S. Naval Institute and Editor-in-Chief of Proceedings magazine. He is a 1987 graduate of the U.S. Naval Academy who served 29 years on active duty as a naval intelligence officer. He joined the staff of the Naval Institute in 2016.

Bill served as the intelligence officer with an FA-18 squadron, a Navy SEAL Team, a carrier air wing, and a carrier strike group. His shore tours included the Office of Naval Intelligence, the Joint Staff (J-2) in the Pentagon from 1999–2002, naval attache to Russia from 2004-2006, head of the China Division at the Joint Intelligence Operations Center in the Pacific, and deputy division chief for Middle East strategy at the National Counterterrorism Center from 2013–2016. Bill was in the Pentagon on 9/11/2001 and helped lead the initial intelligence response team in the immediate aftermath of the terrorist attacks. 

Bill started writing for Proceedings as a lieutenant. He served on the Naval Institute Board of Control and Editorial Board from 1993–1997 and continued to write throughout his career. 

More Stories From This Author View Biography

Related Articles

Hero - Editor's Page
P Editor's Page

The Annual Naval Review

By Bill Hamblet
May 2021
In addition to the Naval Review—a recap of the past year in the Sea Services—the May issue of Proceedings contains the three General Prize Essay Contest winners.
Marines + dog
P Editor's Page

Expeditionary Warfare: Naval Integration Moves Forward

By Bill Hamblet
April 2021
The American Sea Power Project resumes this month, with Nick Lambert’s “What Is a Navy For?” This “must read” article gets to the heart of Alfred Thayer Mahan’s writings.
Editor
P Editor's Page

International Navies: Balancing Force Structure and Modernization

By Bill Hamblet
March 2021
The International Navies issue is one of my favorites every year, perhaps because it reminds me of some of the best moments of my Navy career.

Quicklinks

Footer menu

  • About the Naval Institute
  • Books & Press
  • Naval History
  • USNI News
  • Proceedings
  • Oral Histories
  • Events
  • Naval Institute Foundation
  • Photos & Historical Prints
  • Advertise With Us
  • Naval Institute Archives

Receive the Newsletter

Sign up to get updates about new releases and event invitations.

Sign Up Now
Example NewsletterPrivacy Policy
USNI Logo White
Copyright © 2025 U.S. Naval Institute Privacy PolicyTerms of UseContact UsAdvertise With UsFAQContent LicenseMedia Inquiries
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
Powered by Unleashed Technologies
×

You've read 1 out of 5 free articles of Proceedings this month.

Non-members can read five free Proceedings articles per month. Join now and never hit a limit.