Skip to main content
USNI Logo USNI Logo USNI Logo
Donate
  • Cart
  • Join or Log In
  • Search

Main navigation

  • About Us
  • Membership
  • Books & Press
  • USNI News
  • Proceedings
  • Naval History
  • Archives
  • Events
  • Donate
USNI Logo USNI Logo USNI Logo
Donate
  • Cart
  • Join or Log In
  • Search

Main navigation (Sticky)

  • About Us
  • Membership
  • Books & Press
  • USNI News
  • Proceedings
  • Naval History
  • Archives
  • Events
  • Donate

Sub Menu

  • Essay Contests
    • About Essay Contests
    • Innovation for Sea Power
    • Marine Corps
    • Naval Intelligence
  • Current Issue
  • The Proceedings Podcast
  • American Sea Power Project
  • Contact Proceedings
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Media Inquiries
  • All Issues
An F/A-18F assigned to Fighter Attack Squadron (VFA) 213 lands at Van Voorhis Airfield at Naval Air Station Fallon, Nevada, during the final phase of carrier air wing training before deploying. Aviation squadron intelligence officers and enlisted intelligence specialists often arrive at the month-long Fallon training phase with little in-depth knowledge of the adversary, the platform they support, or the mission-planning process.
An F/A-18F assigned to Fighter Attack Squadron (VFA) 213 lands at Van Voorhis Airfield at Naval Air Station Fallon, Nevada, during the final phase of carrier air wing training before deploying. Aviation squadron intelligence officers and enlisted intelligence specialists often arrive at the month-long Fallon training phase with little in-depth knowledge of the adversary, the platform they support, or the mission-planning process.
U.S. Navy (Daniel Penn)

Sub Menu

  • Essay Contests
    • About Essay Contests
    • Innovation for Sea Power
    • Marine Corps
    • Naval Intelligence
  • Current Issue
  • The Proceedings Podcast
  • American Sea Power Project
  • Contact Proceedings
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Media Inquiries
  • All Issues

Naval Aviation Intelligence Personnel Need Better Training

By Lieutenants Gretchen Arndt and Ben Hernandez, U.S. Navy
February 2021
Proceedings
Vol. 147/2/1,416
Professional Notes
View Issue
Comments

Naval intelligence officers (AIs) and enlisted intelligence specialists (ISs) assigned to carrier aviation squadrons are not given adequate baseline training prior to or held to sufficiently rigorous tactical knowledge standards during their tours. These deficiencies yield substandard intelligence support for squadrons and neglect the AI and IS professional development needed to succeed in subsequent tours.

This problem is not unsolvable, but solving it will require leaders in naval aviation and naval intelligence to take a fresh look at how aviation intelligence personnel are trained. AIs and ISs need early training tailored to the platforms and missions they support and continual training thereafter to further develop knowledge and refine skills.

A Quick History of Aviation Intelligence

Early in World War II, aviators largely were responsible for analyzing the intelligence they collected. As the war progressed, however, the Bureau of Aeronautics (BuAer) realized the demand for specialized intelligence support outstripped aviators’ abilities. BuAer established the Naval Air Combat Intelligence Officers School to train air combat intelligence officers (ACI officers with the 1350 designator).1

The end of World War II brought large-scale military demobilization, but with the start of the Korean War, the need for trained ACI officers again became urgent. The Navy scrambled to locate qualified ACI officers and recalled 52 reservists to active duty. These seasoned World War II–era ACI officers applied their experience to refine afloat intelligence support procedures and articulate requirements to the reconstituted Air Intelligence School, to ensure new ACI officers would arrive prepared to support naval aviation squadrons.2 In the 1950s, the Navy established a restricted line officer community for intelligence (special duty intelligence officers with the 1630 designator), and in 1968, the Navy included ACI officers in an expanded 1630 community.

From that point, very few naval intelligence officers remained specialized in supporting aviation. Instead, most would follow general naval intelligence career paths that might include only an initial AI tour with a naval aviation squadron (some would return as O-4s to serve as air wing intelligence officers).3 This model has not changed appreciably in more than 50 years.

Meaningful Air Intelligence Baseline Training

Today, the Naval Intelligence Officer Basic Course (NIOBC) and Intelligence Specialist A and C Schools, all located at the Navy and Marine Corps Intelligence Training Center in Dam Neck, Virginia, introduce AIs and ISs to basic military intelligence and the breadth of naval operations it supports. Because these personnel graduate their basic courses to serve in anything from a tactical unit to a strategic-level watch floor, in-depth aviation intelligence coursework is not included.

NIOBC graduates detailed to aviation squadrons attend a two-week Basic Aviation Intelligence Course (BAIC) taught by the intelligence department of Strike Fighter Weapons School Atlantic (SFWSL) at Oceana Naval Air Station in Virginia Beach. ISs do not attend BAIC after completing their initial intelligence training. The Naval Aviation Warfighting Development Center (NAWDC) in Fallon, Nevada, is currently doing a BAIC curriculum review, because SFWSL is not currently manned or resourced to run baseline training for every naval aviation platform as well as specialized instruction in FA-18 Super Hornet intelligence support.

Responding to feedback from intelligence personnel and their squadrons, the EA-18G Growler community took action and enhanced its airborne electronic attack intelligence training, which is administered by a well-resourced, well-staffed intelligence department at the Electronic Attack Weapons School at Naval Air Station Whidbey Island, Washington.4 The introductory course taught to new AIs and ISs (and cryptologic technicians technical) arriving to their squadrons applies baseline skills to support EA-18G squadron operations. An intermediate phase focuses on mastery of skills through application, and an advanced concepts course is taught during unit-level predeployment workups.

While some introductory-level concepts could be taught at BAIC, most topics are unique to the EA-18G mission. The training of tactical intelligence personnel must be based on the tactics and capabilities of the platforms they support.

The commanders of Naval Information Forces and Naval Air Forces should collaborate to replicate the EA-18G community’s intelligence training program across all of naval aviation. A baseline of platform- and mission-specific aviation intelligence training requirements must be established. Commander Naval Air Forces should fund the necessary staff and resources at NAWDC and type wing weapons schools to teach the new syllabi.5

Establish Standards to Advance Tactical Excellence

Carrier air wing (CVW) squadrons on both coasts complete many predeployment training evolutions. The capstone evolution is Air Wing Fallon, conducted by NAWDC, which tests a CVW’s ability to function as an integrated strike projection entity with minimal external support. The NAWDC staff recently debuted an updated Air Wing Fallon curriculum that increases demand for high-caliber intelligence support. Lacking platform- and mission-specific intelligence training prior to attending Air Wing Fallon, many squadron AIs and ISs will not be able to meet that demand.6

Squadron AIs and ISs often arrive at Air Wing Fallon with little in-depth knowledge of the adversary, the platform they support, or the mission-planning process.7 As a result, NAWDC’s intelligence instructors have to teach the CVW intelligence team the basics of the job, when they should be refining advanced capabilities. Supporting naval aviation missions requires continual updates to knowledge and skills. NAWDC should mandate in-squadron training for aviation intelligence personnel as a prerequisite for Air Wing Fallon. The type wing weapons schools should develop the curricula, and training should be overseen by squadron training officers.

Finally, to help AIs and ISs devote the necessary time to learn both U.S. naval aviation tactics and capabilities and those of an increasingly complex adversary, to the greatest extent possible they should not be saddled with time-intensive collateral security duties. Personnel and physical security duties are best performed by specially trained yeomen and administrative officers. Funding and filling these billets will put security duties in the hands of experts and allow intelligence personnel to be more proficient supporting ready rooms.

Building Better Intelligence Professionals

AIs and ISs who are well-trained and knowledgeable on the threats will provide high-quality intelligence support during carrier strike group operations. This level of proficiency and honed analytic tradecraft also will benefit the future commands in which these AIs and ISs will serve. Their thorough understanding of U.S. Navy systems, tactics, and operations will help them to contribute more effectively in joint planning and execution environments.

U.S. adversaries are as skilled as they have ever been and are fielding better equipment than they ever have. To use former Chief of Naval Operations Admiral John Richardson’s words: “The margins of victory are razor thin, but decisive.” Excellence in naval intelligence support to aviation could be the decisive factor in that victory.

1. CAPT Wyman H. Packard, USN (Ret), A Century of U.S. Naval Intelligence (Office of Naval Intelligence, Washington, DC): 170–73.

2. Packard, A Century of U.S. Naval Intelligence, 34,175–76.

3. Packard, 34.

4. Electronic Attack Weapons School intelligence officers attend graduate-level platform- and mission-focused training at the Growler Tactics Instructor Course taught by the Airborne Electronic Attack Weapons School (HAVOC), the EA-18G sister command to TOPGUN and also in Fallon, Nevada. Royal Australian Air Force (RAAF) exchange intelligence officers posted to EAWS attend RAAF weapons and tactics instructor courses prior to arrival.

5. Type wing weapons schools, including the Strike Fighter Weapons Schools Atlantic and Pacific and the Electronic Attack Weapons School, are training commands established on the basis of their respective aircraft and charged with teaching graduate-level tactics, techniques, and procedures to fleet squadrons.

6. Carrier Air Wings 3, 11, and 17 Air Wing Fallon training officer out briefs, November, August, and April 2020.

7. NAWDC staff observations indicate that EA-18G Growler AIs and ISs routinely perform above average in Air Wing Fallon.

Lieutenant Gretchen Arndt

Lieutenant Arndt commissioned as an intelligence officer through Officer Candidate School in 2016. Her first assignment was to VAQ-133, where she supported EA-18G Growler, Carrier Air Wing 9, and Carrier Strike Group 3 operations in the Fifth and Seventh Fleet areas of operations. She is currently the intelligence department head at the Electronic Attack Weapons School at Naval Air Station Whidbey Island.

More Stories From This Author View Biography

Lieutenant Ben Hernandez

Lieutenant Hernandez commissioned as an intelligence officer through Officer Candidate School in 2015. His first assignment was to VFA-213, where he participated in its 2017 Operation Inherent Resolve cruise. He is the most recent intelligence fleet training officer with Strike (N-5) at the Naval Aviation Warfighting Development Center in Fallon, Nevada.

More Stories From This Author View Biography

Related Articles

The Independence-variant littoral combat ship USS Gabrielle Giffords (LCS-10) conducts operations in the South China Sea in July 2020. Like the Freedom-variant LCS, the Independence-variant has unique engineering and shiphandling characteristics.
P Professional Notes

Driving Independence-variant Littoral Combat Ships

By Commander Austin Duff, U.S. Navy
January 2021
The Independence-variant littoral combat ships are a significant departure from traditional ships, in terms of bridge watch-team composition, engineering and hull design, and maneuverability.
The degaussing switchboard in the central control station on board the Arleigh Burke–class guided-missile destroyer USS Michael Murphy (DDG-112) being inspected in 2019. The new Board of Inspection and Survey (InSurv) inspection takes two days and checks approximately 100 fewer pieces of equipment on an Arleigh Burke–class destroyer.
P Professional Notes

The New Board of Inspection and Survey Process Will Fail the Fleet

By Lieutenant Commander Shawn Henry, U.S. Navy
January 2021
The Navy’s Board of Inspection and Survey (InSurv) process recently was simplified, but the change will do more harm than good.
The TS Kennedy en route to Cape Cod, with cadets on board for at-sea training, takes on bunkers from a barge in New York Harbor.
Professional Notes

The Intrepid Voyage of the TS Kennedy

By Captain Douglas R. Burnett, U.S. Navy (Retired)
January 2021
The Kennedy’s summer 2020 cadet training cruise could provide lessons for other training ships on safe sailing during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Quicklinks

Footer menu

  • About the Naval Institute
  • Books & Press
  • Naval History
  • USNI News
  • Proceedings
  • Oral Histories
  • Events
  • Naval Institute Foundation
  • Photos & Historical Prints
  • Advertise With Us
  • Naval Institute Archives

Receive the Newsletter

Sign up to get updates about new releases and event invitations.

Sign Up Now
Example NewsletterPrivacy Policy
USNI Logo White
Copyright © 2025 U.S. Naval Institute Privacy PolicyTerms of UseContact UsAdvertise With UsFAQContent LicenseMedia Inquiries
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
Powered by Unleashed Technologies
×

You've read 1 out of 5 free articles of Proceedings this month.

Non-members can read five free Proceedings articles per month. Join now and never hit a limit.