Skip to main content
USNI Logo USNI Logo USNI Logo
Donate
  • Cart
  • Join or Log In
  • Search

Main navigation

  • About Us
  • Membership
  • Books & Press
  • USNI News
  • Proceedings
  • Naval History
  • Archives
  • Events
  • Donate
USNI Logo USNI Logo USNI Logo
Donate
  • Cart
  • Join or Log In
  • Search

Main navigation (Sticky)

  • About Us
  • Membership
  • Books & Press
  • USNI News
  • Proceedings
  • Naval History
  • Archives
  • Events
  • Donate

Sub Menu

  • Essay Contests
    • About Essay Contests
    • Innovation for Sea Power
    • Marine Corps
    • Naval Intelligence
  • Current Issue
  • The Proceedings Podcast
  • American Sea Power Project
  • Contact Proceedings
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Media Inquiries
  • All Issues
At boot camp, deviations from standards often result in intense screaming and “knife hands” by drill instructors, so recruits quickly learn the negative consequences of their actions. However, it sets them up to be suboptimal leaders when they enter the Fleet Marine Force.
At boot camp, deviations from standards often result in intense screaming and “knife hands” by drill instructors, so recruits quickly learn the negative consequences of their actions. However, it sets them up to be suboptimal leaders when they enter the Fleet Marine Force.
U.S. Marine Corps

Sub Menu

  • Essay Contests
    • About Essay Contests
    • Innovation for Sea Power
    • Marine Corps
    • Naval Intelligence
  • Current Issue
  • The Proceedings Podcast
  • American Sea Power Project
  • Contact Proceedings
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Media Inquiries
  • All Issues

Iron-Fist Leadership Is Not Leadership

By Chief Warrant Officer 3 Theodore “Ted” F. Schmit II, U.S. Marine Corps (Retired)
July 2020
Proceedings
Vol. 146/7/1,409
Leadership Forum
View Issue
Comments

A Marine’s first introduction to military leadership is often at Recruit Training or Officer Candidate School (OCS). Concepts such as the 14 leadership traits and the 11 leadership principles are academically ingrained. We learn about and are told stories of war heroes who led Marines in combat and overcame seemingly impossible odds.

At the same time, the leadership we experience during initial training differs greatly from these ideals. It is characterized by OCS instructions and drill instructors (DIs) routinely shouting at recruits and constantly pushing them to their limits. Deviations from standards and knuckleheaded decisions are punished with even more intense yelling, precisely aimed “knife hands,” and objects hurled down the “DI Highway” and reinforced through painful, intensive training sessions. While these methods may drive home to new Marines that there are negative consequences for disobedience, disciplinary infractions, and failures to uphold the standards, they also set the stage for less-than-optimal leadership in the future. Personally, I served a long time before I figured out that leadership by way of an iron fist is not leadership at all.

For new Marines, DIs and OCS instructors often are the earliest role models. Many aspire to be like them and attempt to emulate their behavior. If nothing else, they teach every Marine that rank identifies the people who are in charge and we must do as we are told. Failure to comply almost certainly will result in unpleasant penalties that, quite possibly, will adversely affect us for years to come.

Intimidation Is Not Inspiring

Much of a young Marine’s leadership exposure is based on coercing individual actions through intimidation. Although there is no doubt they learn lessons from a variety of combat-oriented disciplines, the medium remains the same: unfamiliar environments, unknown outcomes, intense friction, constant discomfort, relentless supervision, and aggressive leadership. Over time, habits conducive to military life are formed and valuable lessons are learned—just as intended.

Many Marines arrive at their first duty stations in the Fleet Marine Force (FMF) and have nothing to rely on to guide them except the experiences of their earliest days in the Corps. Often, they resort to what they experienced in their training, but in a more diluted form. Over the years, these Marines—officers and enlisted alike—find new mentors and mimic them. This likely explains why sayings such as, “That’s why we get paid the big bucks,” “There are 24 hours in a day,” “It’s a leadership issue,” and the like get repeated year after year in response to presumed deficiencies and grievances.

Leadership styles develop over time, but recruits and candidates are profoundly affected when they are initially trained and treated in a manner that is unacceptable anywhere else in the Corps. Why should we be surprised when we hear a corporal screaming at her Marines? She was told and taught not to incorporate such practices into her leadership style, yet, iron-fist tactics were the first leadership examples with which the Marine Corps provided her.

Rank Is Responsibility

Often following the Corps’ introductory leadership model, I relied heavily on my rank to entice Marines to do what was required to accomplish the mission. This was how a majority of the leaders I observed led their subordinates. It also seemed to be an efficient method. Unfortunately, it was not until my 11-year service mark that I recognized that rank and leadership are two different things. It occurred to me that it takes no skill to boss people around by leveraging one’s authority.

Many Marine leaders eventually come to a time of transition where leadership through authority evolves into leadership through art. Only then, with these powerful revelations, do they grasp the human dynamic and start to understand how to maximize their own leadership potential and, more important, the potential of their subordinates. The best leaders are able to answer the call of Marine Corps Doctrinal Publication (MCDP) 6 to never “lessen the role of people or to make people act like robots, but rather to help them perform better.”

Unfortunately, a significant number of leaders—even in positions of great responsibility who have served more than 20 years in the Corps—still have not initiated the transition to begin mastering the art of leadership. These Marines struggle to understand that being a leader is not the act of rousing subordinates through intimidation, assigning blame, dismissing Marines for mistakes, and approaching complex problems with overly simplistic assumptions. As such, they miss out on four valuable leadership revelations:

  1. Ineffective leaders almost always leverage authority; strong ones build relationships based on respect, understanding, and trust.
  2. Novice and mediocre leaders often seek to place blame; experienced leaders own it.
  3. Disengaged and short-sighted leaders apply names to billets based on rank and/or the status quo; knowledgeable and visionary leaders find unique, individual attributes and apply them suitably.
  4. Indifferent leaders who are focused on other things often make hasty assumptions and apply trendy labels to problems; concerned leaders engage, think critically, identify the underlying issues, and implement solutions.
Drill and OCS instructors spend a lot of time pushing recruits to their limits. Is it any wonder, then, that a young corporal mimics this leadership when placed in charge of his or her first unit?Drill and OCS instructors spend a lot of time pushing recruits to their limits. Is it any wonder, then, that a young corporal mimics this leadership when placed in charge of his or her first unit?
Drill and OCS instructors spend a lot of time pushing recruits to their limits. Is it any wonder, then, that a young corporal mimics this leadership when placed in charge of his or her first unit? U.S. Marine Corps (David Bessey)

Surveys Are Not the Answer

As a warfighting organization, the Marine Corps has many policies and procedures—performance evaluations, professional military education, request mast, and more—to prevent injustices, stop unacceptable leadership behaviors, and promote leadership development. Regrettably, these measures have not been successful enough. Individual inabilities to move beyond iron-fist leadership may be one reason why so many officers have been relieved from command early these past few years.

At both the individual and organizational levels, being relieved of a command is not to be taken lightly—especially when the reason is a basic and recurring loss of trust and confidence. Nevertheless, it is concerning that after at least a decade of honorable service, several promotion boards, continuous interactions with other Marines, regular performance evaluations, and ongoing military success, these leaders—all of a sudden—can no longer be trusted. It does not make sense. Perhaps their behavior has always been the same but was never corrected, or maybe their leaders omitted flaws from their performance evaluations to keep the peace. In any case, there comes a point when such leaders can no longer hide their aggressive habits and inabilities to understand the human element.

The disconnect with the human element has focused the Corps and many commanding officers on the importance of Command Climate Surveys. Positive surveys can reflect a commander’s authentic interest in the overall well-being of the command. On the other hand, there also are some commanders who become abnormally pleasant and highly engaged right before the surveys become accessible to their Marines. When this occurs, chances are that something is wrong with their normal approach to leadership and they do not want this problem revealed. This may result in surveys that are not reliable. Even when surveys do accurately assess a poor command climate, they do little to prevent bad and malicious leadership in the first place.

If the Marine Corps wants to develop good leaders, it must give them examples as early in their careers as possible and do away with the iron-fist tactics recruits experience in boot camp.
If the Marine Corps wants to develop good leaders, it must give them examples as early in their careers as possible and do away with the iron-fist tactics recruits experience in boot camp. U.S. Marine Corps (Caitlin Brink)

Set the Example Early

To foster a positive environment in which every Marine has the opportunity to thrive, leaders must be taught about the human element from the earliest points in their careers and every step along the way. Here are three recommendations for how the Marine Corps can do leadership better:

  1. Help Marines better understand people by incorporating comprehensive leadership training that delves into human psychology and supports the concept of leadership as art.
  2. Develop more accurate ways to assess and report leadership abilities. Consider overhauling the performance evaluation process, for example, to prevent individual favoritism, deter reluctance to report accurately, and omit repetitive justifications and time-consuming rebuttals.
  3. Set the example from day one. Sending Marines into intense training environments is understandable; however, these situations should rely less on intimidation tactics and more on leaders who set an example of the respect and teamwork that we want Marines to demonstrate in the future.

Mastering the art of leadership requires humility. I am not ashamed to admit that it took me more than a decade to realize that iron-fist tactics lack the dexterity with which to lead Marines effectively. Instead, it takes a people-centered approach that combines the empathy to understand and value every Marine, with the devotion to never lessen the Corps’ high standards of discipline. Marines who are guided by such genuine devotion and authentic leadership can accomplish anything.

Chief Warrant Officer 3 Theodore Ted F. Schmit II, U.S. Marine Corps (Retired)

Chief Warrant Officer Schmit recently retired after serving as the maintenance management officer and technical advisor for the U.S. Marine Corps Special Operations Command (MARSOC), Marine Raider Training Center (MRTC), at Camp Lejeune. He previously deployed to Operations Iraqi and Enduring Freedom.

More Stories From This Author View Biography

Related Articles

Marines man security positions during a mission in Helmand province, Afghanistan. Being a good leader means knowing when to hold the line and follow orders, and when to speak up about potential shortfalls.
P Leadership Forum

Don’t Just ‘Shut Up and Row’

By Major Brian Kerg, U.S. Marine Corps
April 2020
The cultural attitude to find a way to say yes and the refusal to fail reinforces a culture of overlooking, ignoring, and even covering up shortfalls.
Active-duty sailors should learn how to talk about their jobs as ships’ cooks, air-traffic controllers, and aviation mechanics in ways that will appeal to the public sector should they decide to separate from the service.
P Leadership Forum

Unpack Military Leadership for the Civilian Transition

By Captain Steve Vincent, U.S. Navy (Retired)
May 2020
Formally recognizing functional competencies would help service members perform their jobs better and be more ready to transition to a civilian job when the time comes.
Many Navy and Marine Corps leaders use briefings  as an instrument for behavior modification, but they should lean on Command Religious Programs to help develop the character of their Marines and sailors.
P Leadership Forum

Character Building Requires Education

By Captains Michael E. Foskett and Charles E. Varsogea, Chaplain Corps, U.S. Navy
June 2020
Navy and Marine leaders should lean on Command Religious Programs to help develop the character of their Marines and sailors.

Quicklinks

Footer menu

  • About the Naval Institute
  • Books & Press
  • Naval History
  • USNI News
  • Proceedings
  • Oral Histories
  • Events
  • Naval Institute Foundation
  • Photos & Historical Prints
  • Advertise With Us
  • Naval Institute Archives

Receive the Newsletter

Sign up to get updates about new releases and event invitations.

Sign Up Now
Example NewsletterPrivacy Policy
USNI Logo White
Copyright © 2025 U.S. Naval Institute Privacy PolicyTerms of UseContact UsAdvertise With UsFAQContent LicenseMedia Inquiries
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
Powered by Unleashed Technologies
×

You've read 1 out of 5 free articles of Proceedings this month.

Non-members can read five free Proceedings articles per month. Join now and never hit a limit.