Skip to main content
USNI Logo USNI Logo USNI Logo USNI 150th Anniversary
Donate
  • Cart
  • Join or Log In
  • Search

Main navigation

  • About Us
  • Membership
  • Books & Press
  • USNI News
  • Proceedings
  • Naval History
  • Archives
  • Events
  • Donate
USNI Logo USNI Logo USNI Logo USNI 150th Anniversary
Donate
  • Cart
  • Join or Log In
  • Search

Main navigation (Sticky)

  • About Us
  • Membership
  • Books & Press
  • USNI News
  • Proceedings
  • Naval History
  • Archives
  • Events
  • Donate

Sub Menu

  • Essay Contests
    • About Essay Contests
  • Current Issue
  • Subscribe to Naval History
    • Naval History Digital Subscription
    • Renew Your Subscription
  • Naval History Blog
  • Submisison Guidelines
  • Contact Naval History
    • Media Inquiries
  • All Issues
An April 1980 test of the Self-Initiating Antiaircraft Missile (SIAM) developed by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency. The missile was fired from a test stand at the White Sands Missile Range in New Mexico and intercepted a Gyrodyne QH-50 Drone Antisubmarine Helicopter (DASH). The test missile lacked a warhead but successfully intercepted the unmanned helicopter (insets)
An April 1980 test of the Self-Initiating Antiaircraft Missile (SIAM) developed by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency. The missile was fired from a test stand at the White Sands Missile Range in New Mexico and intercepted a Gyrodyne QH-50 Drone Antisubmarine Helicopter (DASH). The test missile lacked a warhead but successfully intercepted the unmanned helicopter (insets)
DARPA, courtesy of the author

Sub Menu

  • Essay Contests
    • About Essay Contests
  • Current Issue
  • Subscribe to Naval History
    • Naval History Digital Subscription
    • Renew Your Subscription
  • Naval History Blog
  • Submisison Guidelines
  • Contact Naval History
    • Media Inquiries
  • All Issues

Subs vs. Planes

By Norman Polmar
December 2020
Naval History Magazine
Volume 34, Number 6
Armaments & Innovations
View Issue
Comments

Almost as soon as submarines became serious weapons of war, aircraft became their nemesis. Beginning in World War I, British and U.S. airplanes and blimps attacked German U-boats operating on the surface, where submarines normally sailed—at least until the advent of nuclear propulsion in the 1950s. Prior to that, submarines typically submerged only to evade or attack an enemy.

Consequently, submarines often were fitted with antiaircraft guns. For example, U.S. submarines in World War II were armed with 20-mm Oerlikon and 40-mm Bofors “wet mount” guns to fight off aircraft while surfaced. Even some recent nuclear-powered submarines have to operate at or near the surface to carry out some missions (such as attacking ships and launching missiles), making them more vulnerable to possible aircraft detection and attack.

SIam Reported Characteristics

Could a submerged submarine engage an aircraft? In the 1960s, several countries began developing subsurface-to-air missiles that could be launched from the near-surface against low-flying aircraft, especially helicopters. Britain, Israel, and the Soviet Union put these weapons at sea on a limited basis. But those systems required the submarine to be on the surface—or to at least broach its sail—to launch the missiles.

As recently as the early 2000s, the U.S. Navy conducted experiments to develop a submarine-launched version of the AIM-9 Sidewinder air-to-air missile, in a project dubbed “Subwinder.” On 19 November 2005, an AIM-9X missile was vertically launched from a stationary, land-based test platform. The heat-seeking missile successfully acquired and destroyed the slow-moving QH-50 DASH target drone with a direct hit. (The DASH was an antisubmarine helicopter drone, originally designated DSN; it was changed to QH-50 in 1962 as part of the standardization of U.S. military aircraft designations. See “The Unmanned Helicopter,” December 1999, pp. 10–11.)

The missile specification called for the weapon to be encased in a launch capsule that would be ejected from a submarine operating at periscope depth. When the capsule broached the surface, the missile would launch, acquire the target, and engage it. But the missile project was not pursued.

Before Subwinder, in the late 1970s, the United States began development of the Submarine Air-Defense System, also known as the Self-Initiating Antiaircraft Missile (SIAM), sponsored by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA). SIAM was intended to be launched from a completely submerged submarine.

 

This Gyrodyne QH-50 DASH was employed as a target in the SIAM tests. Note the flare dispensers on the metal rack projecting left and right of the airframe. Originally designated DSN-1, DASH was developed to deliver an antisubmarine torpedo or nuclear depth charge against submarines detected by shipboard sonars. These unmanned helicopters also were employed for gunfire spotting and as target drones.
This Gyrodyne QH-50 DASH was employed as a target in the SIAM tests. Note the flare dispensers on the metal rack projecting left and right of the airframe. Originally designated DSN-1, DASH was developed to deliver an antisubmarine torpedo or nuclear depth charge against submarines detected by shipboard sonars. These unmanned helicopters also were employed for gunfire spotting and as target drones. Courtesy of the author

The initial detection of fixed-wing aircraft and helicopters was to be accomplished with the standard submarine-towed acoustic arrays. Once launched, the missile would use its onboard dual-mode radar/infrared guidance system to acquire a target autonomously. In 1979, DARPA contracted with the Ford Aerospace Corporation to demonstrate the SIAM concept’s feasibility. 

The first flight test of a technology demonstration missile—designated DTV-4—occurred in April 1980, at the White Sands Missile Range in New Mexico. The missile was ground-launched against a remote-controlled QH-50 DASH helicopter equipped with flares, which could be dropped from racks extending from the fuselage to distract the missile. The helicopter was hovering at 1,500 feet during the tests.

The missile’s booster rocket ejected it from the launch tube to an altitude of about 500 feet, at which point the missile spun to search an entire hemisphere for a target. When the radar acquired the drone, the spinning stopped, and the missile’s main rocket motor ignited to propel it toward the target. As it neared the helicopter, its guidance shifted from radar to terminal-homing infrared to perform the final maneuvers. The missile lacked a live warhead and fuze, but it was stated that the target would have been destroyed had they been included. Reports say that in subsequent tests the drone was destroyed.

Despite the success of the SIAM trials, the Navy did not pursue the project. Some sources contend that it was disregarded for financial reasons, while others assert that submariners did not want to have any weapon that required them to remain near the surface when an aircraft was detected. However good the antiair missile, the advantage lay with the aircraft. 

Norman Polmar

Norman Polmar is an analyst, consultant, and author, specializing in naval, aviation, and technology subjects. He has been a consultant or advisor on naval issues to three Senators, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, and three Secretaries of the Navy as well as to the director of the Los Alamos national laboratory, and to the leadership of the U.S., Australian, Chinese, and Israeli Navies. He has written or coauthored more than 50 published books.

More Stories From This Author View Biography

Related Articles

A quartermaster takes a sun sighting from the navigation bridge of the USS Alaska (CB-1) in 1945.
NH Armaments & Innovations

Navigating to the Sextant

By Philip K. Allan
June 2020
The 20th-century sextant never fails to attract the attention of visitors, whether or not they have an interest in the sea.
The Weehawken is depicted with its original “minesweeper” about to explode a Confederate torpedo. The illustration is from the 25 April 1863 edition of Harper’s Weekly.
NH Armaments & Innovations

Armaments & Innovations - Ericsson’s Devil

By J. M. Caiella
August 2020
The first "minesweeping" device was officially called the Ericsson Obstruction Remover. It became better known in Southern circles and the Northern press as Ericsson’s Devil.
The helm of the USS Constitution shows the characteristic features of ships’ wheels from the time before steam or electric motors controlled the rudder. Two wheels, separated by a winch barrel, allowed extra helmsmen to assist in heavy weather. The barrel is connected through the deck by a series of blocks and tackles to the tiller, which turns the rudder.
NH Armaments & Innovations

Steering with a Wheel

By Philip K. Allan
October 2020
Steering a ship with a wheel seems such a universal concept that it is hard to imagine a time when it was not done. But in fact, Columbus sailed the ...

Quicklinks

Footer menu

  • About the Naval Institute
  • Books & Press
  • Naval History Magazine
  • USNI News
  • Proceedings
  • Oral Histories
  • Events
  • Naval Institute Foundation
  • Photos & Historical Prints
  • Advertise With Us
  • Naval Institute Archives

Receive the Newsletter

Sign up to get updates about new releases and event invitations.

Sign Up Now
Example NewsletterPrivacy Policy
USNI Logo White
Copyright © 2023 U.S. Naval Institute Privacy PolicyTerms of UseContact UsAdvertise With UsFAQContent LicenseMedia Inquiries
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
Powered by Unleashed Technologies
×

You've read 1 out of 5 free articles of Naval History this month.

Non-subscribers can read five free Naval History articles per month. Subscribe now and never hit a limit.