Skip to main content
USNI Logo USNI Logo USNI Logo
Donate
  • Cart
  • Join or Log In
  • Search

Main navigation

  • About Us
  • Membership
  • Books & Press
  • USNI News
  • Proceedings
  • Naval History
  • Archives
  • Events
  • Donate
USNI Logo USNI Logo USNI Logo
Donate
  • Cart
  • Join or Log In
  • Search

Main navigation (Sticky)

  • About Us
  • Membership
  • Books & Press
  • USNI News
  • Proceedings
  • Naval History
  • Archives
  • Events
  • Donate

Sub Menu

  • Essay Contests
    • About Essay Contests
    • Diversity & Inclusion
    • Enlisted Prize
    • NPS Foundation
    • Naval Mine Warfare
  • Current Issue
  • The Proceedings Podcast
  • U.S. Naval Institute Blog
  • American Sea Power Project
  • Contact Proceedings
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Media Inquiries
  • All Issues
CNO Harold Stark's famous 1940 "Dog Memo"
Chief of Naval Operations Admiral Harold Stark's November 1940 "Dog Memo."
FDR Library

Sub Menu

  • Essay Contests
    • About Essay Contests
    • Diversity & Inclusion
    • Enlisted Prize
    • NPS Foundation
    • Naval Mine Warfare
  • Current Issue
  • The Proceedings Podcast
  • U.S. Naval Institute Blog
  • American Sea Power Project
  • Contact Proceedings
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Media Inquiries
  • All Issues

A Naval Memo of Grand Strategic Importance

Just over a year before the U.S. entry into World War II, Chief of Naval Operations Admiral Harold Stark wrote a strategic memorandum to Secretary of the Navy Frank Knox outlining the challenges and choices ahead. It should be required reading for naval professionals, joint planners, and civilian policymakers today.
By Captain Gerard D. Roncolato, U.S. Navy (Retired)
May 2021
Proceedings
Vol. 147/5/1,419
Commentary
View Issue
Comments

On 12 November 1940, Chief of Naval Operations Admiral Harold K. “Betty” Stark, undertook to lay out U.S. options in the event of war against Germany, Japan, or both. In a way that is nearly unimaginable today, he wrote it himself, at home, without any staff support or involvement. It took him eighteen hours, working straight through, to complete his analysis. He reviewed several possible scenarios and plans, lettering them from “A” through “D,” and ultimately recommended Plan “D.” At that time, the U.S. Navy’s phonetic alphabet for “D” was “dog”: hence it became known as the “Plan Dog Memorandum.” 

To appreciate Admiral Stark’s brilliance, it is important to understand something of the context in which he wrote his memorandum. During 1940, after continued German, Italian, and Japanese campaigns of conquest, U.S. leaders came to realize that the scenarios underlying the old “color-coded” war plans—that the United States would fight a war against a single enemy one-on-one—were no longer realistic. The United States was increasingly likely to face war against multiple enemies across the globe. In which case, the country would need allies—which, by late 1940, meant the British Empire. 

CNO Admiral Harold Stark
Chief of Naval Operations Admiral Harold R. Stark, U.S. Navy, in April 1940.
(Naval History and Heritage Command)

By November of that year, France had fallen, and Britain stood alone against Nazi Germany and its Italian allies. The German bombing campaign—the Blitz—against Britain had begun. Recognizing the consequences of a British defeat, President Franklin Roosevelt had been gradually increasing U.S. support to the United Kingdom, first through the “cash and carry” policy in September 1939, and then through the “destroyers for bases” deal in September 1940 (Lend-Lease would follow in December 1940). In Asia, meanwhile, Japan’s invasion of China continued, and in September they occupied the northern part of French Indo-China. 

However, Roosevelt was constrained by public opinion, which strongly opposed U.S. involvement in another major foreign war. Stark’s memorandum, therefore, came at a critical time—before the United States was formally at war, but as war was looking more and more likely. It was by no means clear what course the United States should or would follow.

Admiral Stark laid out the essence of the grand strategic problem facing the United States, and he concisely crafted the best courses of action. He did so with a deep understanding of the U.S. military, the nation’s political culture, and the mood of its people. Note the importance he rightly attached to public opinion and public expectations. 

Similar to Stark, we must ask (and answer) the hard questions. Should the United States stand and oppose Chinese aggression? If it does not, what will be the impact on U.S. and global security and prosperity? If the United States does oppose Chinese hegemony, what will be the likelihood of war? What would such a war look like and how best to prepare for it? What role would sea power take in such a conflict? 

To this nation’s—and the world’s—great benefit, CNO Stark had the training, education, and intellect to pen this memo, at home, on his own, in a day. That is worth remembering. Doubtless each reader will come away with different conclusions from the Dog Memo; yet every reader’s understanding of strategy, national security, and the naval profession will be enlightened in the reading. 

Captain Gerard D. Roncolato, U.S. Navy (Retired)

Captain Roncolato is an independent consultant focused on Navy strategy and crew training.  A retired surface warfare officer, he commanded the guided-missile destroyer USS The Sullivans (DDG-68) and Destroyer Squadron 26.

More Stories From This Author View Biography

Related Articles

Morning Thunder by Robert Taylor ©The Military Gallery
P Article

Plenty of Blame to Go Around

By Paul Stillwell
December 2016
Virtually everyone in a position of authority, from Washington to Honolulu, was culpable for being so thoroughly taken by surprise by the attack on Pearl Harbor.
Theodore Roosevelt Speaks
NH Featured Article

The Roots of Roosevelt’s Navalism

By Nicholas J. Danby
February 2021
Historians long have credited Alfred Thayer Mahan with shaping Theodore Roosevelt’s ideas about sea power.
Aerial view of U.S. Navy ships of the Third Fleet steaming toward Tokyo Bay
NH Featured Article

FDR & His Mighty Navy

By Michael D. Hull
February 2019
“Teddy” Roosevelt may be lauded as the great pro-Navy President, but it was Franklin Roosevelt “who was the most vigorous advocate of naval readiness ever to occupy the White House.”

Quicklinks

Footer menu

  • About the Naval Institute
  • Books & Press
  • Naval History Magazine
  • USNI News
  • Proceedings
  • Oral Histories
  • Events
  • Naval Institute Foundation
  • Photos & Historical Prints
  • Advertise With Us
  • Naval Institute Archives

Receive the Newsletter

Sign up to get updates about new releases and event invitations.

Sign Up Now
Example NewsletterPrivacy Policy
USNI Logo White
Copyright © 2023 U.S. Naval Institute Privacy PolicyTerms of UseContact UsAdvertise With UsFAQContent LicenseMedia Inquiries
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
Powered by Unleashed Technologies
×

You've read 1 out of 5 free articles of Proceedings this month.

Non-members can read five free Proceedings articles per month. Join now and never hit a limit.