This html article is produced from an uncorrected text file through optical character recognition. Prior to 1940 articles all text has been corrected, but from 1940 to the present most still remain uncorrected. Artifacts of the scans are misspellings, out-of-context footnotes and sidebars, and other inconsistencies. Adjacent to each text file is a PDF of the article, which accurately and fully conveys the content as it appeared in the issue. The uncorrected text files have been included to enhance the searchability of our content, on our site and in search engines, for our membership, the research community and media organizations. We are working now to provide clean text files for the entire collection.
In an article in the Armed Forces Journal, Russell Murray noted that the Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS) “was, and still is, not a satisfactory source of disinterested, professional military advice on joint matters.”1 He traced this deficiency to the members’ dual- hatted responsibilities. Each is supposed to be both an advocate for his own service and an unbiased advisor on broader issues.