- ISBN/SKU: 9781612514475
- Binding: Hardcover & eBook
- Number of Pages: 240
- Subject: Naval History
- Date Available: April 2014
Clear The Decks Price*
Your tax-deductible gift to the Naval Institute Press underwrites worthy books that might not otherwise be published.
— Praise for Home Squadron —
“Rentfrow throws fresh light on the many senior officers, most today obscure, who helped shape the fleet’s evolution in the period, such as Stephen B. Luce, Bancroft Gherardi, or John G. Walker. Particularly interesting is how these exercises fitted into the work of the fleet, and of the North Atlantic Squadron in particular. In the process, Rentfrow touches upon a surprising number of long-forgotten crises, from the ‘Virginius Affair’ through interventions in Panama, Haiti, and elsewhere, to policing fisheries, and on to the eve of the Spanish-American War, by which time the North Atlantic Squadron had become a capable combat force with a coherent doctrine. A volume in the series ‘New Perspectives in Maritime History and Naval Archaeology,’ Home Squadron is an excellent addition to the literature on the history of the U.S. Navy.”—The Strategy Page.com
"In his first historical monograph, Home Squadron, James Rentfrow explores the modernization of the US Navy in the period leading up to Spanish-American War (1898). He concentrates on changes in doctrine, strategy, tactics, and ship inventory that helped the Navy transition from a fleet of loosely governed wooden ships of sail operating independently and randomly, to a fleet of steam-powered steel warships working coherently as a singular fighting unit. Using the operational records of the North Atlantic Squadron (NAS) between the US Civil War and the Spanish-American War, the author attempts to clarify how the American Navy secured commercial interests abroad and took significant steps toward supremacy on the sea."—Michigan War Studies Review
“The epilogue is a prime example of what conclusive chapter in a history book should be—a review of facts elaborated in previous chapters that lead to the conclusion. Rentfrow even provides the arguments of other historians of how the transition occurred, comparing the changes in the U.S. Navy at the end of the 19th century to the challenges to today’s Navy. He says the fight against global terrorism is forcing the Navy to consider change again to its strategy and tactics. Home Squadron…worthy to be included in any naval officer’s library and especially used to study this most important part of the history of the U.S. Navy.”—The Daybook, Hampton Roads Naval Museum
“All in all, this book tells a story that is important for understanding late nineteenth century American naval history and naval theory and operations. The narrative is focused, concise, and clearly written. Rentfrow has a command of the vast secondary literature and the primary government documents, personal papers, and contemporary periodicals. Anyone interested in the late nineteenth-century US Navy must read this volume.”—International Journal of Maritime History
“This book should be read by all those interested in the modern U. S. Navy. The author lays a solid foundation that allows student of naval history to comprehend the philosophical reasoning that shaped the interwar fleet exercises and the development of the office of the Chief of Naval Operations.”—Journal of America's Military Past
“The development of the U.S. Navy between the Civil War and the Spanish-American War is only lightly chronicled, and this book goes a long way in adding weight as it describes the U.S. Navy’s transition from wooden steam- and wind-powered ships to armored steel steamships, and from a patrol force to a true battle fleet, setting the stage for a world-class navy in the 20th century.”—Seapower
"This is a vital, seldom analyzed period of our Navy's growth and author Rentfrow gives the topic the scope and insight it deserves."—Sea Classics
“Exhaustive notes, a bibliography, and an index round out this exceptional addition to nautical and military history shelves, highly recommended especially for college library collections.”—The Midwest Book Review
“Sailor-scholar James Rentfrow has done us all a great service by chronicling and analyzing the historical roots of the current U.S. Navy’s intensely operational nature. Multiship warship exercises, operations, and tactics at sea may be the hallmarks of our modern naval force, but their origins in the late nineteenth century have, strangely never been comprehensively examined until now. Anyone involved in contemporary strike group operations—of any navy—will gain from learning how it all began, and why.”
—Capt. Peter M. Swartz, USN (Ret.), principal research scientist, CNA
“Cdr. James Rentfrow's Home Squadron fills a critical gap in our understanding of the evolution of the modern Navy. A superb analytical effort, it conveys within a flowing literary style the story of the critical years of the Navy's other “inter-war period,” when it finally transitioned from wood and sail to steel and steam, developing all new tactics and maneuvers along the way. Rentfrow also examines the critical personalities who weighed in to pull the Navy out of the doldrums to set the stage for the United States' emergence as a great power in the twentieth century. This is a strong effort that I am sure will become a trusted reference for scholars of the period.”
—Capt. Henry J. Hendrix, USN, director of the Naval History and Heritage Command
* * * * * * * *
This study examines the transformation of the United States Navy as a fighting organization that took place on the North Atlantic Station between 1874 and 1897. At the beginning of this period, the warships assigned to this station were collectively administered by a rear-admiral, but were operationally deployed as individual units, each of whose actions were directed by their captains. By 1897 the North Atlantic, or “Home” Squadron as it was known, was a group of warships constituting a protean battle fleet – that is, an organized body moving and fighting in close-order, which meant that the actions of the captains were directed by a commanding admiral.
The process of the development of an American battle fleet resulted in the construction of a new organizational identity for the North Atlantic Squadron. This process was as critical as the eventual outcome. It was not linear, but one in which progress in critical areas was modulated by conflicting demands that caused distraction. From 1874-1888, exercises in fleet tactics under steam were carried out sporadically utilizing existing wooden cruising vessels. From 1889-1894, the last wooden cruisers were decommissioned and the Squadron consisted entirely of new steel warships. Ad-hoc concentrations of vessels for purposes besides exercise and training retarded the continued development of doctrine and tactics necessary for a multi-ship fighting capability during this time. However, much work was done to develop a concept of multi-ship operations. From 1895-1897, the identity of the North Atlantic Squadron as a combat unit solidified. Tactical exercises were held that had specific offensive and defensive wartime applications. These exercises were necessary to develop a combat capability.
The results of this study demonstrate that the United States government had an interest in developing an offensive naval combat capability as early as the 1870’s. Based on the record of the North Atlantic Squadron, it is argued that imperial aspirations, in the sense of possessing a capability to restrict the actions of other great powers in the Caribbean region, existed prior to the War of 1898. However, the process of change often resulted in the appearance of capability without the rigorous exercise necessary to possess it.
Upon graduation from the U.S. Naval Academy in 1989, Commander James C. “Chris” Rentfrow completed flight school and was designated a naval flight officer. After a career flying the EA-6B Prowler, Commander Rentfrow was selected to participate in the Permanent Military Professor program. He did his doctoral work at the University of Maryland, College Park and currently teaches U.S. and naval history at the Naval Academy.