Skip to main content
USNI Logo USNI Logo USNI Logo
Donate
  • Cart
  • Join or Log In
  • Search

Main navigation

  • About Us
  • Membership
  • Books & Press
  • USNI News
  • Proceedings
  • Naval History
  • Archives
  • Events
  • Donate
USNI Logo USNI Logo USNI Logo
Donate
  • Cart
  • Join or Log In
  • Search

Main navigation (Sticky)

  • About Us
  • Membership
  • Books & Press
  • USNI News
  • Proceedings
  • Naval History
  • Archives
  • Events
  • Donate

Sub Menu

  • Essay Contests
    • About Essay Contests
    • Innovation for Sea Power
    • Marine Corps
    • Naval Intelligence
  • Current Issue
  • The Proceedings Podcast
  • American Sea Power Project
  • Contact Proceedings
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Media Inquiries
  • All Issues
Taigei submarine
The Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force has successfully mounted lithium-ion batteries in its new Taigei submarine. This is an opportunity for the U.S. Navy to engage in a navy-to-navy discussion on the use of naval high-power batteries.
Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force PAO

Sub Menu

  • Essay Contests
    • About Essay Contests
    • Innovation for Sea Power
    • Marine Corps
    • Naval Intelligence
  • Current Issue
  • The Proceedings Podcast
  • American Sea Power Project
  • Contact Proceedings
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Media Inquiries
  • All Issues

Start a Dialogue on High-Power Sub Batteries

By Anand Datla and Commander Paul Giarra, U.S. Navy (Retired)
October 2021
Proceedings
Vol. 147/10/1,424
Now Hear This
View Issue
Comments
Body

The U.S. Navy and Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force (JMSDF) are known for close (and closely held) submarine operational coordination. That said, the JMSDF’s successful mounting of lithium-ion batteries in the Taigei, its new diesel-electric submarine, is a significant technical breakthrough that should be the subject of both a technology and an operational exchange between the United States and Japan. It is an opportunity to examine the use of naval high-power batteries for both countries. The Taigei not only has significant technical ramifications, but also raises pivotal operational factors with strategic-level implications.

Technically, the U.S. Navy would do well to review the analytical approach taken by the JMSDF toward battery chemistry before it decided to replace its air independent propulsion (AIP) and lead acid battery propulsion plant. In total, the JMSDF reviewed ten lithium-ion options before narrowing them down to lithium nickel cobalt aluminum oxide (NCA) and lithium titanate (LTO). It compared the NCA chemistry’s higher voltage and battery capacity with LTO’s higher charge/discharge rate, significantly longer life cycle, and (now proven) inherently safe chemistry. Understanding the reasons the JMSDF chose NCA would help the United States in its own battery research.

The JMSDF released a tender to build the lithium-ion battery to two domestic suppliers: GS Yuasa and Toshiba Corporation. GS Yuasa, a large industrial lithium-ion battery producer, supports international customers in multiple sectors and is a significant sponsor of research and development related to lithium-ion battery densities. Having both public- and private-sector presence undoubtedly helps develop technical talent. Toshiba, one of Japan’s largest multinational conglomerates and top defense contractors, has provided electronics and other technologies for the country’s military for decades and has provided advanced lithium-ion propulsion batteries for the JMSDF’s new deep-submergence submarine rescue vehicle (DSRV). The multi-domain participation of its workforce supports talent across multiple technical sectors, and Toshiba’s battery business benefits greatly from its vertical integration. These firms’ research and development and industrial capacity and their relationship with the government of Japan should be of interest for U.S. planning.

display quote - NHT - 10-21

Japan’s testing of lithium-ion batteries for mounting in the Taigei appears to have been rigorous and independent—conducted by the Defense Ministry’s Acquisition, Technology & Logistics Agency (ATLA). This arrangement and the process for testing and certification are potentially important points of interest for the navy-to-navy dialogue, especially given that Defense News reports that “Japan introduced lithium-ion batteries into its submarines after a lengthy development and testing period, which started as far back as 2002. Extensive testing starting in 2006.” This long-term focus and its context bear careful examination.

Given the instances of spontaneous combustion of some lithium-ion chemistries, U.S. analysts also should understand how the JMSDF addressed the safety implications of incorporating lithium-ion batteries at sea, in particular, in the closed environment of a submarine. Lingering concerns, including combustion caused by impurities introduced in the manufacturing process, are one reason strict production-line quality control is so important. These and other safety concerns, including hydrogen outgassing, have been mitigated or solved by physical design, battery controls, and advances in battery chemistry over the past decade.

A technical discussion would help the United States understand the JMSDF’s decision to pursue the Taigei solution rather than the AIP Stirling engine and lead acid batteries in the Sōryū class. Its calculations and experience with underwater speeds, endurance, and indiscretion rates achieving low signature and long submerge time would be illuminating. This is especially so given the reported $540 million price of the Sōryū versus the Taigei at $720 million, which underscores JMSDF confidence in lithium-ion propulsion.1 Apparently, the JMSDF concluded the higher cost was worth the wait to fit it into the budget. Also, it would be significant if JMSDF confidence in its Taigei solution clears the way for the more general use of lithium-ion batteries and their increasingly higher power.

Operationally, JMSDF tactical employment concepts for the Taigei are another important topic for discussion. This would include the advantages of eliminating the AIP set and its cycles, as well as being able to operate submerged at high speed and for longer periods at low speed.

Potential tactical advantages of lithium-ion batteries include the ability to discharge energy and recharge faster than other non-nuclear submarines. The fast discharge rate translates into more rapid dive times and the ability to move faster submerged, and the reduced indiscretion rate afforded by rapid recharging has considerable operational significance, including but not limited to fleet barrier operations amid the capes, headlands, straits, and archipelagos of the first island chain.

This is not to suggest that the U.S. Navy consider building diesel-electric submarines. That debate can continue elsewhere. However, the Taigei and related current technical and operational developments should call into question the U.S. nuclear Navy’s antipathy to battery propulsion, even if not in the context of its own force structure. First, this is an opportunity to reconsider the operational advantages that lithium-ion battery powered JMSDF submarines will bring to combined U.S. Navy–JMSDF fleet operations in and near the first island chain and on China’s maritime approaches.

Second, all navies are rapidly developing and integrating large fleets of battery-powered submersibles, the U.S. Navy included and notwithstanding its nuclear power preferences. These submersibles just happen to be unmanned.  The proliferation of unmanned underwater vehicles will further drive renewed emphasis on lithium-ion propulsion derived advantages in submarine stealth and indiscretion rates.

Third, given the recent announcement regarding nuclear submarines for Australia, these and other U.S.–Japan operational considerations are even more salient and necessarily should include the Royal Australian and Royal Navies.  One issue will be whether and how to reinforce current operational advantages and “flood the zone” with more diesel-electric and nuclear submarines.

The presumed spin-on technical and operational benefits of the Taigei class will be an important factor in submarine competition with China. An understanding by both navies of the Taigei’s technical specifications and tactical performance will add to allied interoperability and operational dominance.

1. James Holmes, “It’s Unlikely, But U.S. Diesel Subs Would Be One Way to Take on China,” War Is Boring, 18 March 2017; and “Japan Unveils New Submarine in Face of China’s Growing Assertiveness,” The Japan Times, 14 October 2020.

2. Mike Yeo, “Japan Commissions Its First Submarine Running on Lithium-ion Batteries,” Defense News, 6 March 2020.

By Anand Datla

Mr. Datla is a consultant and former Defense Department civilian who has worked on strategic planning, policy, and operations. He also served as a professional staff member of the House Armed Services Committee.

More Stories From This Author View Biography

Commander Paul Giarra, U.S. Navy (Retired)

Commander Giarra is the president of Global Strategies & Transformation. During his naval career, he was a P-3 pilot, served in two ships, attended two war colleges (Navy junior and Japan senior), and was a designated strategic planner and alliance manager.

More Stories From This Author View Biography

Related Articles

Innovation Cell
P The Innovation Cell

Better Living (and Fighting) through Batteries

By Staff Sergeant Jairo I. Patino, U.S. Marine Corps
February 2021
Figuring out the next significant improvement in battery technology is the key to keeping the edge in emerging and disruptive technologies.
Spain is considering using lithium-ion batteries in its new S-80 class submarines, the first of which, the Isaac Peral, currently is under construction.
P Featured Article

A Revolution in Submarine Propulsion

By Commander Augusto Conte-Rios and Ensign Juan-Diego Pelegrin-Garcia, Spanish Navy
October 2020
Lithium-ion batteries paired with air-independent propulsion can improve submarine endurance and performance.
The German submarine S 138 (U33) in the Kiel Canal
P Article

Non-Nuclear Submarines? Choose Fuel Cells

By Ensign John Minnehan, U.S. Navy
June 2019
Fuel cell–powered submarines could offer the U.S. Navy a non-nuclear alternative that is stealthy, mobile, and affordable.

Quicklinks

Footer menu

  • About the Naval Institute
  • Books & Press
  • Naval History
  • USNI News
  • Proceedings
  • Oral Histories
  • Events
  • Naval Institute Foundation
  • Photos & Historical Prints
  • Advertise With Us
  • Naval Institute Archives

Receive the Newsletter

Sign up to get updates about new releases and event invitations.

Sign Up Now
Example NewsletterPrivacy Policy
USNI Logo White
Copyright © 2025 U.S. Naval Institute Privacy PolicyTerms of UseContact UsAdvertise With UsFAQContent LicenseMedia Inquiries
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
×

You've read 1 out of 5 free articles of Proceedings this month.

Non-members can read five free Proceedings articles per month. Join now and never hit a limit.