Skip to main content
USNI Logo USNI Logo USNI Logo
Donate
  • Cart
  • Join or Log In
  • Search

Main navigation

  • About Us
  • Membership
  • Books & Press
  • USNI News
  • Proceedings
  • Naval History
  • Archives
  • Events
  • Donate
USNI Logo USNI Logo USNI Logo
Donate
  • Cart
  • Join or Log In
  • Search

Main navigation (Sticky)

  • About Us
  • Membership
  • Books & Press
  • USNI News
  • Proceedings
  • Naval History
  • Archives
  • Events
  • Donate

Sub Menu

  • Essay Contests
    • About Essay Contests
    • CNO Naval History - Professional Historian
    • CNO Naval History - Rising Historian
    • Naval Intelligence
  • Current Issue
  • The Proceedings Podcast
  • U.S. Naval Institute Blog
  • Submission Guidelines
  • Contact Proceedings
    • Media Inquiries
  • All Issues
2016 Fleet Week New York
2016 Fleet Week New York

Sub Menu

  • Essay Contests
    • About Essay Contests
    • CNO Naval History - Professional Historian
    • CNO Naval History - Rising Historian
    • Naval Intelligence
  • Current Issue
  • The Proceedings Podcast
  • U.S. Naval Institute Blog
  • Submission Guidelines
  • Contact Proceedings
    • Media Inquiries
  • All Issues

DoD Can Close the Civil-Military Divide

The growing separation between the military and society is dangerous for democracy. DoD is the government agency best equipped to address it.Since George Washington resigned his commission at Annapolis in 1783, the U.S. system has depended on the military’s subordination to civilian control. In the past, it was easy to maintain this control, as the military remained small in times of peace and then expanded its ranks with “citizen soldiers” during times of war.1 Drawn from all locations and walks of life, these citizen soldiers served because their country, not the profession of arms, had called. In addition, these citizen soldiers served in units organized by state and led by local officers, so their ties with their home populations remained strong. By World War II, however, the government opted for a nationally integrated military, and it did not disband it after the war. After Vietnam, the government went a step further, eliminating the draft and replacing the citizen soldier with the professional or career soldier.
By Lieutenant Adam Aliano, U.S. Navy, and Nate MacKenzie
December 2016
Proceedings
Article
View Issue
Comments

As a result, we now have a relatively small but very powerful standing force that is isolated from the majority of the American public and in which only a very small percentage of the population will ever serve. Consider these statistics:

• Only .5 percent of Americans serve on active duty at any given time, compared with more than 12 percent in World War II.2

• Up to 80 percent of those in uniform come from military families.3

• Both during and following their service, military members tend to live apart from the rest of society. In the United States, nearly half of all active-duty service members are concentrated in just five states—California, Virginia, Texas, North Carolina, and Georgia.4

Member-Only Content

Join the U.S. Naval Institute to gain access to this article and other articles published in Proceedings since 1874. Members receive this valuable benefit and so much more.

Become a Member Today

If you are already a Member, please log in to gain access, and thank you for your Membership.

Quicklinks

Footer menu

  • About the Naval Institute
  • Books & Press
  • Naval History Magazine
  • USNI News
  • Proceedings
  • Oral Histories
  • Events
  • Naval Institute Foundation
  • Photos & Historical Prints
  • Naval Institute Archives

Receive the Newsletter

Sign up to get updates about new releases and event invitations.

Sign Up Now
Example NewsletterPrivacy Policy
USNI Logo White
Copyright © 2021 U.S. Naval Institute Privacy PolicyTerms of UseContact UsAdvertise With UsFAQContent LicenseMedia Inquiries
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
Powered by Unleashed Technologies