Now Hear This - Engage, Interact, Deter

By Lieutenant Commander David C. Sandomir, U.S. Navy

• Engagement and interaction manages military inertia in the region through mutual exercise of shared interests, improved communication, and a stronger enterprise for preventing miscalculations at sea.

• Increasing offensive capabilities applies friction against the perceived benefits of using A2/AD weapons and shrinks politico-military space in Beijing for choosing force or coercion on the seas as an extension of any grand vision or “national rejuvenation.”

There are recognizable barriers to this framework. One such challenge is determining whether China even wants to cooperate. Many experts point out Beijing’s long-standing suspicion toward U.S. sea power, which manifests itself through deep anxiety about U.S. interdiction capabilities on the sea routes and involvement in regional affairs. And, with Beijing’s “terraforming” of underwater reefs into island bases and excessive sovereignty claims, it seems that peaceful interaction is antithetical to its grand vision—perhaps even an illusion. But external pressure on Beijing to play a responsible leadership role in the region cannot be abandoned.

Another barrier resides in the existing zero-sum environment in the Asia-Pacific. China’s leadership has expressed in open forum the desire to “transcend” Cold War zero-sum thinking, but the numerous actions the country has taken to intimidate nations and assert its influence are more indicative of zero-sum antics. The resulting counterweights are apparent. Allies and partners in the region are getting edgy about China’s opaque military spending and provocations in the South China and East China Seas. Therefore, increasing lethality on U.S. surface combatants and instituting innovative doctrine to deal with such hazardous signaling makes sense as tensions in the region continue to grow. The former action could help discourage the perception by Beijing of its A2/AD dominance with the realization that “its objectives could be thwarted in force-on-force engagement,” Sam J. Tangredi argues in his book Anti-Access Warfare: Countering A2/AD Strategies (Naval Institute Press, 2013). In this way, the United States can signal a clear response to future actions aimed at its core national interests.

But this is only one part of the holistic construct. While engagement is a difficult national policy choice, it also makes sense, as policy frameworks should deliver stabilizing mechanisms that not only protect vital U.S. interests and reassure allies of our resolve, but also forge opportunities to maintain an open dialogue and promote mutual goals.


Lieutenant Commander Sandomir is a surface warfare officer assigned as a Federal Executive Fellow at The Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy, Tufts University.

 

 

 
 

Conferences and Events

Maritime Security Dialogue

Fri, 2018-10-05

Maritime Security DialogueNaval Aviation: Readiness Recovery for Combat A discussion with VADM DeWolfe Miller, USNCommander,...

The New China Challenge

View All

From the Press

22 September - Annual Symposium

Sat, 2018-09-22

22 September - Annual Symposium

Sat, 2018-09-22

John B. Lundstrom

Why Become a Member of the U.S. Naval Institute?

As an independent forum for over 140 years, the Naval Institute has been nurturing creative thinkers who responsibly raise their voices on matters relating to national defense.

Become a Member Renew Membership