Editor's Page

In the event a maritime crisis does arise, whether with Russia in European waters, Iran in the Persian Gulf, or China in the Pacific, U.S. naval forces will be the first to go in harm’s way. All three potential adversaries present anti-access challenges. To defeat these, the Navy must be able to quickly and persistently barrage a target with multiple ordnance. Retired Navy Captain Sam Tangredi argues that this would best be accomplished with a vessel such as an arsenal ship—a concept first conceived in the 1980s. Essentially a self-propelled barge with minimal personnel and hosting a multitude of vertical-launch systems, it would be “an adjunct to the Fleet, not a core component,” more cost-effective, and thus a valuable gap filler. With a primary mission of breaking anti-access walls, funds could be spent on its ordnance rather than hull or propulsion plant. “In an anti-access environment, the arsenal ship is the most logical near-term means of maintaining the credibility of U.S. naval and joint military influence,” Tangredi reasons.

If that ordnance does start to fly, Fleet communications may be among the first capabilities affected. What then? At the 1798 Battle of the Nile, the great Horatio Nelson “prevailed despite almost no communications with his captains once the battle commenced.” In the World War II Pacific theater, Fleet Admiral Chester W. Nimitz issued broadly worded orders because there was “an underlying assumption that commanders could be trusted to execute them.” Today, everything that occurs on the tactical level is instantly being observed and (worst-case scenario) micromanaged all the way up the operational chain to the top strategic level, in real time. Such is the sophistication of today’s battlespace communications—but therein also lies the problem, notes Navy Captain Patrick Molenda of Headquarters, Pacific Fleet. We have become so used to the constant data feed, there’s a real risk if we’re ever faced with a comms-denied environment. The solution, maintains the author, is to bring back the time-honored competencies of mission command; when the chips are down and so are the computers, capable and autonomous clutch decision-making needs to happen without the usual safety net.


The Naval Review issue requires a lot of extra effort to deliver its additional content, and I want to extend a special thanks to those contributors who give their time and energy to provide us with the annual roundups of the Sea Services: Scott Truver; Robert Holzer; Joe DiRenzo; David Boyd; Commander Jan Jacobs, U.S. Navy Reserve (Retired); Lieutenant Colonel John Berry Jr., U.S. Marine Corps (Retired); Shashi Kumar; and Lieutenant Jim Dolbow, U.S. Coast Guard Reserve. They work steadily throughout the year accumulating the information found in these pages—all on their own time. I’m sure I speak for all our readers when I say it’s highly valued and much appreciated.

Paul Merzlak , Editor-in-Chief

 

 
 

Conferences and Events

Maritime Security Dialogue

Fri, 2018-10-05

Maritime Security DialogueNaval Aviation: Readiness Recovery for Combat A discussion with VADM DeWolfe Miller, USNCommander,...

The New China Challenge

An Evening of Naval History

View All

From the Press

22 September - Annual Symposium

Sat, 2018-09-22

22 September - Annual Symposium

Sat, 2018-09-22

John B. Lundstrom

Why Become a Member of the U.S. Naval Institute?

As an independent forum for over 140 years, the Naval Institute has been nurturing creative thinkers who responsibly raise their voices on matters relating to national defense.

Become a Member Renew Membership