Editor's Page

Secretary Hagel’s December announcement that the Navy would up-gun the LCS may have been welcome news to some, but according to longtime Proceedings author retired Rear Admiral William J. Holland Jr., “those actions unfortunately do not reflect the vision or the necessary planning for the next generation of warships.” Tomorrow’s Fleet will require successors to the Arleigh Burke –class guided-missile destroyer and the Virginia attack submarine, and the designers of that force should be getting to work now to identify what the vessels might look like ten years down the road. Admiral Holland spells out in careful detail the process the Navy must follow to ensure it gets the Fleet it needs.

Gregory Cox takes a closer look at the LCS to determine what lessons can be learned when developing future small surface combatants. He believes that “the Navy writ large lacked a coherent vision for LCS, or perhaps more accurately, different elements within the Navy had (at least) three distinct visions that conflicted with each other.” Performance issues aside, Cox considers these differing visions to have stymied the LCS’s acceptance—both in and out of the Navy. In the pursuit of its next surface combatant, the Navy needs to clearly articulate exactly what that ship is expected to do.

As the Navy plans its future Fleet, it must consider two important trends: the escalating cost of new vessels as well as the return of a combined-arms threat. Retired Commander Jim Griffin thinks the Navy must develop a platform that is both adaptable and economical to stay competitive at sea—and within its budget. While he discounts the LCS for its questionable survivability, ballooning price tag, and limiting single-mission modules, he believes that the newly commissioned mobile landing platform could provide a template for the type of vessel to fill this role. “Designed from the outset to be rapidly reconfigurable for a range of missions, she epitomizes the idea of payload over platform and leverages an existing design that could be rapidly built with a modular capability to accept new missions,” he argues. “A variant could provide the Navy with a . . . cost-efficient, flexible platform capable of supporting all of [its] missions.”

Paul Merzlak , Editor-in-Chief



Conferences and Events

WEST 2019

Wed, 2019-02-13 - Fri, 2019-02-15

Sharpening the Competitive Edge: Are We Ready to Compete, Deter, and Win Globally? Wednesday, 13 February - Friday, 15 February...

2019 U.S. Naval Institute Member Event

View All

From the Press

17 January - Book Talk

Thu, 2019-01-17

18 January - Presentation

Fri, 2019-01-18

Why Become a Member of the U.S. Naval Institute?

As an independent forum for over 140 years, the Naval Institute has been nurturing creative thinkers who responsibly raise their voices on matters relating to national defense.

Become a Member Renew Membership