Skip to main content
USNI Logo USNI Logo USNI Logo
Donate
  • Cart
  • Join or Log In
  • Search

Main navigation

  • About Us
  • Membership
  • Books & Press
  • USNI News
  • Proceedings
  • Naval History
  • Archives
  • Events
  • Donate
USNI Logo USNI Logo USNI Logo
Donate
  • Cart
  • Join or Log In
  • Search

Main navigation (Sticky)

  • About Us
  • Membership
  • Books & Press
  • USNI News
  • Proceedings
  • Naval History
  • Archives
  • Events
  • Donate

Sub Menu

  • Essay Contests
    • About Essay Contests
    • Marine Corps
    • Naval Intelligence
  • Current Issue
  • The Proceedings Podcast
  • U.S. Naval Institute Blog
  • Submission Guidelines
  • Contact Proceedings
    • Media Inquiries
  • All Issues

Sub Menu

  • Essay Contests
    • About Essay Contests
    • Marine Corps
    • Naval Intelligence
  • Current Issue
  • The Proceedings Podcast
  • U.S. Naval Institute Blog
  • Submission Guidelines
  • Contact Proceedings
    • Media Inquiries
  • All Issues

Points of Interest: 'Need' Becomes Final Argument against Concurrent Receipt

By Tom Philpott
October 2002
Proceedings
Article
View Issue
Comments

In early September, Congress moved nearer to ending the century-old ban on "concurrent receipt" of both military retired pay and Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) disability compensation, for the most severely disabled among career retirees.

White House budget officials continued to wield a veto threat over the measure, however, and defense officials tried to persuade lawmakers to keep the ban in place with a new, perhaps final argument that most disabled retirees are not so bad off financially that they need the extra money, which would total $2,100 or more per month to a person rated 100% disabled.

Dr. David Chu, Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness, became the Defense Department's lead critic of concurrent receipt. In an interview he noted that results of a 1996 department survey showed average household income among all military retiree families, officers and enlisted, at $60,000 per year. That average held steady, he said, regardless of a retiree's disability rating, suggesting VA-rated disabilities are not keeping retirees from productive second careers.

Member-Only Content

Join the U.S. Naval Institute to gain access to this article and other articles published in Proceedings since 1874. Members receive this valuable benefit and so much more.

Become a Member Today

If you are already a Member, please log in to gain access, and thank you for your Membership.

Quicklinks

Footer menu

  • About the Naval Institute
  • Books & Press
  • Naval History Magazine
  • USNI News
  • Proceedings
  • Oral Histories
  • Events
  • Naval Institute Foundation
  • Photos & Historical Prints
  • Naval Institute Archives

Receive the Newsletter

Sign up to get updates about new releases and event invitations.

Sign Up Now
Example NewsletterPrivacy Policy
USNI Logo White
Copyright © 2021 U.S. Naval Institute Privacy PolicyTerms of UseContact UsAdvertise With UsFAQContent LicenseMedia Inquiries
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
Powered by Unleashed Technologies