Skip to main content
USNI Logo USNI Logo USNI Logo
Donate
  • Cart
  • Join or Log In
  • Search

Main navigation

  • About Us
  • Membership
  • Books & Press
  • USNI News
  • Proceedings
  • Naval History
  • Archives
  • Events
  • Donate
USNI Logo USNI Logo USNI Logo
Donate
  • Cart
  • Join or Log In
  • Search

Main navigation (Sticky)

  • About Us
  • Membership
  • Books & Press
  • USNI News
  • Proceedings
  • Naval History
  • Archives
  • Events
  • Donate

Sub Menu

  • Essay Contests
    • About Essay Contests
    • Innovation for Sea Power
    • Marine Corps
    • Naval Intelligence
  • Current Issue
  • The Proceedings Podcast
  • American Sea Power Project
  • Contact Proceedings
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Media Inquiries
  • All Issues

Sub Menu

  • Essay Contests
    • About Essay Contests
    • Innovation for Sea Power
    • Marine Corps
    • Naval Intelligence
  • Current Issue
  • The Proceedings Podcast
  • American Sea Power Project
  • Contact Proceedings
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Media Inquiries
  • All Issues

Special: London Conference Stresses Importance of Offshore Mission

By Antony Preston
October 1995
Proceedings
Vol. 121/10/1,112
Article
View Issue
Comments

The Royal Institution of Naval Archi­tects (RINA) is noted for its annual summer naval conferences, not just be­cause of its prestige as a professional body but because of the high standard of discussion. Papers are vetted to exclude the standard salesmen’s product plugging, and the discussion from the audience is always vigorous. The conferences also include subjects outside the narrow con­fines of pure ship design, broadening the appeal considerably.

This year’s conference, held at Trin­ity House in London on 14-15 June, lived up to expectations. Geoffrey Fuller, Chairman of the RINA Council, sug­gested that we should think in terms of a littoral zone extending from the outer edge of the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) to 50 miles inland. He called for new concepts in the design of offshore patrol vessels (OPVs), bearing in mind that there has been no major innovation in ship design for nearly 30 years.

His paper, “Blue Water v. Brown Water,” drew attention to the confusion that exists in defining the littoral zone— some preferring to distinguish between the green-water coastal zone and the brown-water rivers and estuarial waters. That quibble aside, he spoke with the authority of long experience as a naval constructor and shipbuilder, reminding his audience that the sea is to be re­spected, not plundered.

Commander Michael Ranken, Royal Navy, secretary of the United Kingdom Parliamentary Group, reviewed the im­plications of the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UN­CLOS). His examples of the depletion of fish stocks around the world struck a chilling note, reminding us all that pro­tecting offshore assets cannot continue to remain nothing more than a matter of national sovereignty.

Several interesting OPV designs were presented, ranging from monohull ves­sels such as the Blohm+Voss MEKO 100 and the DCN International New Generation Aviso to air-cushion craft such as the ABS M-10. Admiral Rodholm, for­merly of the Royal Danish Navy, pro­vided an update of the Stanflex 300 program and introduced the Stanflex 500 variant. Low cost is one of the most im­portant criteria for OPVs, and the 14 small multirole Stanflex 300 ships are said to have cost 20% less than the same number of conventional craft they have replaced. The appeal of the Stanflex con­cept is the way in which containerized weapon and sensor fits can be exchanged to suit changing mission requirements.

The ABS team presented the M-10 hovercraft, a third-generation design optimized for the military and paramilitary market. The concept centers around low acquisition cost, affordable operating costs, and good seakeeping, diesel en­gines rather than gas turbines, and simple but robust structures. The hull is fabricated from single-skin glass-rein­forced plastic with a Kevlar superstruc­ture. The prototype M-10 has recently been evaluated by the Royal Swedish Navy for over-ice operations and com­pleted the first winter circumnavigation of the Baltic.

On the technical side, Lockheed Mar­tin Missiles & Space presented a paper on the application of stealth technologies to OPVs. Although the paper was clearly presented and very interesting. I for one was not convinced that the full range of 'bolt-on stealth’ measures are as cheap as claimed. They may be cheaper than the measures adopted for major combat­ants, but still not cheap enough for the majority of OPV users. Low probability of intercept (LPI) radars to allow OPVs to defeat the commercially available radar warning systems used by drug smug­glers, or simple electronic support mea­sures (ESM) systems to detect radio and radar transmissions are needed (and they are affordable). Radar absorbent materi­als (RAM) and elaborate measures to re­duce radar and acoustic signatures seem likely to add considerably to the price of a ship intended to deal with infringe­ments of fishing rights.

The representative of Lockheed’s Ca­nadian subsidiary was unable to present his paper on the design of ESM systems suited to the offshore mission. This was a great pity, as the written paper outlined the requirements for ESMs in the offshore protection environment with­out promoting any specific piece of equipment.

To remind the naval architects and de­signers in the audience of the realities of seakeeping, Ken Hope of Australia’s Department of Aerospace & Mechanical Engineering presented a paper on a de­tailed set of trials of the 42-meter patrol craft HMAS Wamambool. These instru­mented trials were carried out in the Bass Strait in August 1992 to study the effects of combined sea and swell on motion lev­els and frequency spectra. Hope said that the experience proved that full-scale ex­periments at sea need not be too costly, and are more convincing than computer estimates.

United Kingdom naviga­tion specialist Kelvin Hughes provided information on their integrated bridge system. This comprises the linked color tactical display (CTD), an electronic chart display unit (CDU) displaying Admiralty Raster Chart Service (ARCS) charts, and a P-code global positioning system (GPS). The system is currently being tested at sea in the liner QE2 and HMS Sheffield, winning high praise from the Navy. The U.S. Coast Guard also is evaluating the CTD to meet its requirement for a new stan­dard bridge display.

The French New Genera­tion Aviso has yet to be built, but it is the basis for a recent (unsuccessful) bid to win the contract to supply four corvettes to the South African Navy. The design derives from work done on the new La Fayette-c\ass ‘stealth’ frigates, although the design is smaller and cheaper. The criteria are reduced cost, lim­ited displacement, container­ized combat system, ability to operate a 20,000-pound heli­copter, accommodation for 100 personnel, and maximum survivability. On an overall length of 86.6 meters and a standard displacement of 1,500 tons, the Aviso carries a medium-caliber gun and a helicopter—10,000-pound class in the hangar or 20,000- pound class on deck. Twin-shaft diesels or a combined diesel and electric (COD- LAD) drive would produce a speed of 24 knots and a range of more than 6,000 nautical miles. The combat system is developed from the SEN1T 8 in the new French carrier Charles de Gaulle.

At the opposite end of the spectrum is the small waterplane area twin hull (SWATH) design. Much has been ex­pected of the SWATH, but to date only the U.S. Navy and Japan's Maritime Self-Defense Force have shown any willing­ness to invest in the concept. A paper pre­sented jointly by Swath International and Blyth Bridges Marine Consultants set out the arguments in favor of a SWATH so­lution to the offshore patrol mission. The advantages are superb seakeeping on a compact and comparatively cheap hull, and the exceptional stability enhances he­licopter operations.

Against these must be set the vessels’ sensitivity to load and excessive draft. In effect, this means that SWATHs are responsive to any subsequent modifica­tion which increases all up weight. Top speed and first cost will be higher than a monohull or catamaran of similar displacement.

The conference looked at a variety of solutions to the problems of offshore protection. Low cost is one common de­nominator, but by no means the only factor. The dash mission, using small, high-speed interceptors, is valid for coun­tries lucky enough to have their assets concentrated in sheltered waters or oper­ating against drug traffickers and smug­glers of contraband (human or other­wise). On the other hand deep sea fisheries can be protected only by Weath­erly craft with sufficient endurance to stay at sea for days on end.

Warships can reinforce the efforts of law enforcement agencies, but they are inherently overarmed and expensive for coast guard duties.

The growing sophistication of the smugglers, particularly in the drug trade, is forcing the introduction of more tech­nology, notably ESM systems, passive electro-optical trackers, and even a mea­sure of stealth. One experienced naval officer speaking from the floor reminded the audience that subtlety and deceit have their place in the inventory. In some cir­cumstances, the type of ship should be as non-naval as possible to get close to offenders, in others a powerful, well­-armed appearance may contribute to the deterrent effect.

Whether navies share responsibility for offshore protection or delegate it to a paramilitary or civilian force, the mission is not one that can be ignored. At a time of savage budget cutting, it is a valuable means of preserving basic skills of sea­manship and command. It also provides a way to spin off technology developed at great expense. As the current dispute between Canada and Spain shows, even prosperous industrialized nations resort to direct action to protect offshore assets.

Antony Preston, a distinguished naval correspondent of long standing, writes the survey column for the Naval Institute’s annual March International Navies Issue.

 

Digital Proceedings content made possible by a gift from CAPT Roger Ekman, USN (Ret.)

Quicklinks

Footer menu

  • About the Naval Institute
  • Books & Press
  • Naval History
  • USNI News
  • Proceedings
  • Oral Histories
  • Events
  • Naval Institute Foundation
  • Photos & Historical Prints
  • Advertise With Us
  • Naval Institute Archives

Receive the Newsletter

Sign up to get updates about new releases and event invitations.

Sign Up Now
Example NewsletterPrivacy Policy
USNI Logo White
Copyright © 2025 U.S. Naval Institute Privacy PolicyTerms of UseContact UsAdvertise With UsFAQContent LicenseMedia Inquiries
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
Powered by Unleashed Technologies
×

You've read 1 out of 5 free articles of Proceedings this month.

Non-members can read five free Proceedings articles per month. Join now and never hit a limit.