Skip to main content
USNI Logo USNI Logo USNI Logo
Donate
  • Cart
  • Join or Log In
  • Search

Main navigation

  • About Us
  • Membership
  • Books & Press
  • USNI News
  • Proceedings
  • Naval History
  • Archives
  • Events
  • Donate
USNI Logo USNI Logo USNI Logo
Donate
  • Cart
  • Join or Log In
  • Search

Main navigation (Sticky)

  • About Us
  • Membership
  • Books & Press
  • USNI News
  • Proceedings
  • Naval History
  • Archives
  • Events
  • Donate

Sub Menu

  • Essay Contests
    • About Essay Contests
    • Innovation for Sea Power
    • Marine Corps
    • Naval Intelligence
  • Current Issue
  • The Proceedings Podcast
  • American Sea Power Project
  • Contact Proceedings
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Media Inquiries
  • All Issues

Sub Menu

  • Essay Contests
    • About Essay Contests
    • Innovation for Sea Power
    • Marine Corps
    • Naval Intelligence
  • Current Issue
  • The Proceedings Podcast
  • American Sea Power Project
  • Contact Proceedings
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Media Inquiries
  • All Issues

The U.S. Merchant Marine and Maritime Industry in 1991

By Robert H. Pouch
May 1992
Proceedings
Vol. 118/5/1,071
Article
View Issue
Comments

This html article is produced from an uncorrected text file through optical character recognition. Prior to 1940 articles all text has been corrected, but from 1940 to the present most still remain uncorrected.  Artifacts of the scans are misspellings, out-of-context footnotes and sidebars, and other inconsistencies.  Adjacent to each text file is a PDF of the article, which accurately and fully conveys the content as it appeared in the issue.  The uncorrected text files have been included to enhance the searchability of our content, on our site and in search engines, for our membership, the research community and media organizations. We are working now to provide clean text files for the entire collection.

 

By Robert H. Pouch


Merchant Mariners had two reasons to feel pride in 1991: the dedication of the U.S. Merchant Marine Memorial! which honors the mariners who died in World War II, and for their accomplishments in Desert Shield and Desert Storm, as they supported one of history’s most extensive logistical operations.

On Tuesday afternoon, 8 October 1991, a large crowd began to assemble in Battery Park in downtown Manhattan. The harbor waters sparkled in the sunlight, and the Statue of Liberty stood impressively in the distance.

The people had come to witness the ded­ication of the U. S. Merchant Marine Memo­rial, a dramatic statuary, built just offshore of the park seawall, de­picting the rescue of merchant mariners from a sinking lifeboat during World War II.

The dedication cere­monies, led by Rear Admiral Tom King,

U.S. Maritime Service (Retired), former Su­perintendent of the U.S. Merchant Marine Academy at Kings Point, were the culmi­nation of a national fund-raising effort to honor sailors who lost their lives in World War II.

In fact, many of the honored guests at the dedication were Merchant Marine vet­erans and survivors of voyages—some suc­cessful, some unsuc­cessful—to places like Normandy and Mur­mansk. Participants could overhear their dramatic stories of grueling wartime trips on freighter and tanker convoys—sto­ries that often ended with torpedoing, sink­ing, casualties, and, for the lucky ones, with rescue and survival.

The tales of these mariners, who came to pay tribute to their lost comrades, were touching, especially for anyone who has sailed on board a merchant vessel. The moment was even more dramatic because the U.S. Merchant Marine recently had been required, once again, to call “All hands on deck,” to support Operation Desert Storm.

As the Navy and Maritime Adminis­tration activated their Reserve fleets, sea­farers poured in from all over the coun­try to fill positions on newly activated ships. There were young people recently graduated from maritime training schools and senior veterans from World War II, some in their 70s, who had not been to sea for years. These sailors answered the call and went to sea.

All of these images were brought to­gether as the maritime industry paused to honor its heroes at the Battery Park sea­wall. It is fitting to dedicate 1991 as the year of the American Mariner.

Maritime Industry Overview

In a nation struggling to shake itself out of economic recession, the Merchant Ma­rine is another example of an industry with a long tail of ancestral problems. High construction and operating costs, gener­ally unsatisfactory levels of freight, an un­successful program of government subsi­dies, and a series of built-in governmental, regulatory, and tax disincentives continue to present major obstacles for U.S.-flag ship owners.

The shipyard industry, which has relied on naval shipbuilding orders for the past two decades, expects to see that market decimated within a few years. A major ra­tionalization is indicated for this sector.

The challenge facing the maritime in­dustry will be to remain competitive in the marketplace or join those who have aban­doned U.S.-flag based shipping to build and operate overseas. In fact, many over­seas nations have welcomed the develop­ment of a maritime investment and service infrastructure. They have lured U.S. in­vestors with a number of attractive in­centives. Regrettably, the U.S. regulatory system has placed a number of very seri­ous regulatory, tax, and environmental dis­incentives in the path of U.S. maritime companies.

When the high level of investment and the risks of operating a business become too burdensome, investment moves else­where. The lack of any coordinated pol­icy approach, either at the governmental level or within the maritime industry it­self, does not provide for much optimism among investors. The challenge will be to work for incremental changes that will im­prove the competitiveness of the system at many levels.

Status of the Fleet

In 1991, the privately owned U.S. fleet consisted of 475 vessels—398 oceango­ing vessels and 77 Great Lakes carriers—

of about 20.3 million tons deadweight. This represents a decrease of one million gross tons from 1990 levels. There were three commercial ships under construction and two additional vessels undergoing con­version. This fleet provided an employ­ment base of approximately 11,500 unli­censed mariners and 5,345 licensed officers.

By contrast, the world merchant fleet stood at 436 million gross tons, a 12.4 million ton increase from 1990. More than 65% of the combined world fleet is at least ten years old, and 15% is more than 20 years old, according to Lloyd’s Register of Shipping and the Maritime Administration.

Maritime Industry-Related Jobs

In addition to shipboard jobs, vessel-re­lated maritime workers, such as long­shoremen and shipyard production per­sonnel, accounted for another 92,000 employees in the maritime industry labor pool at the Atlantic, Gulf, Pacific, and Great Lakes ports.

Maritime Safety and Environmental Issues

No issue in recent memory has ignited more debate and generated more hysteria within the maritime industry than the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 and the number of similar environmental statutes enacted by individual U.S. coastal states. The fear of oil pollution—triggered by the Exxon Valdez accident in Alaska and height­ened by a number of other dramatic and well-publicized spills on the West Coast, the Gulf, and the Atlantic coast—launched an unprecedented wave of legislative and regulatory action.

Some international owners have re­fused to send their tankers to U.S. ports, asserting that absurdly written laws and unlimited liability exposure could ruin them. There also has been speculation that the new laws will encourage risk-takers whose only corporate assets are substan­dard ships—possibly the only ones will­ing to serve the U.S. tanker trade.

The net results of this recent lawmak­ing activity are not all negative, how­ever. Companies involved in the transport and handling of oil and chemicals have in some ways benefited from a national en­vironmental consciousness-raising. Issues °f quality, safety, and personnel training— formerly considered burdensome back-of- f'ce costs for ship and terminal operators— nave assumed a higher priority.

While there are many overage tankers ®nd bulk carriers still trading all over the

world, many nations, classification soci­eties, ship owners, cargo interests, and in­surance companies now are realizing that unsafe or poorly maintained overage ships need to be filtered out of the world fleet. In a beleaguered tanker industry, which has been in a state of constant pain for the past 20 years, everything used to be negotiable.

Now, as a result of the Oil Pollution Act of 1990, there is a general consensus that quality and safety are no longer ne­gotiable items. Nations are beginning to clamp down on lax shipping registries and substandard ships.

In a maritime industry, which is in­ternational in scope but basically un­regulated, these new environmental laws have brought about improvements in the industry’s overall safety and qual­ity standards.

Because of all of the recent environ­mental publicity, consumers are more re­ceptive to the higher costs associated with increased safety and quality, and clean op­eration both at sea and ashore.

U.S. Liner Trades

While the recession has taken its toll on the U.S. economy, international imports and exports of cargo through U.S. ports have seen modest growth. This is partly attributable to the Gulf War. However, the favorable exchange rate of the dollar, and more price-competitive U.S. manufactur­ing industries are playing a growing role in expanding overseas markets for all kinds of U.S. products.

Thus, some major container trade lanes are looking at modest growth during the coming year. U.S.-flag operators, such as American President Lines, SeaLand, and Overseas Shipholding (Central Gulf-Wa­terman), have continued to improve their business infrastructure and have emerged as leaders in innovation and service within a very competitive industry.

The major problem in the liner trades continues to be overcapacity on most trade routes. This has led to predatory pricing and erosion of profits. In some cases, rev­enue per container is well below cost, in spite of the fact that many carriers belong to conferences that can establish pricing with specific antitrust immunity.

Late in the year, Farrell Lines negoti­ated with the Maritime Administration for a $20 million forgiveness of debt in return for a curtailment of its subsidy contract by three years. Lykes Lines chartered four Panamanian-flag ships, formerly operated by Nedlloyd Line, for its service between Africa and Atlantic and Gulf ports.

A Presidential Advisory Commission on Conferences in Ocean Shipping has been examining what steps, if any, should be taken to overhaul the Shipping Act to create a more equitable working envi-

In the wake of defense cuts, future Navy ship construction—here, the guided-missile cruiser Shiloh (CG-67) nears completion at the Bath Iron Works shipyard—is expected to sus­tain only one or two major shipyards and one or two smaller yards in the United States. Unable to compete with subsidized foreign competitors in the commercial marketplace, private U.S. shipbuilding could cease to exist.

ronment within the liner trades. Its report is scheduled for release in the first half of 1992.

Subsidies

The administration has stated its plans to terminate all construction differential subsidies in 1996-97. Similarly, interna­tional negotiations are taking place to seek an end to government subsidies of shipyards worldwide, in an effort to level the playing field for the construction of new ships. There has been no consensus on whether these negotiations will be suc­cessful. or be implemented, in practical terms.

The Cruise Industry

A number of spectacular new cruise vessels, which will operate from U.S. ports, were introduced in 1991. Market

Production Manager Proceedings/Naval History U. S. Naval Institute Annapolis, MD 21402

Be sure to indicate the date of the issue in which the item was pub­lished, the number of copies needed, and your daytime phone number. (Minimum orders: color—500 reprints; black and white—100 reprints.)

the country’s ability to operate commer­cial ships and shipyards and to maintain an experienced maritime industry labor pool, which potentially sets the stage for a further decline of the commercial mer­chant marine.

Such a policy is not in harmony with prior naval theory and doctrine, which ad­vocates that a strong merchant marine, en­gaged in free trade and international com­merce, is a cornerstone of freedom of the seas and world peace. The absence of a national maritime policy does not help to

Spurred on by the Exxon Valdez accident in Alaska, oil pollution and environmental legislation surged. Unlimited liability exposure has scared off some international trade, but not all of the effects have been negative. Quality, safety, and training standards have improved.

projections indicate that only a small per­centage of Americans have ever taken a cruise, and cruise operators are betting that beautiful new ships, with high standards of decor, cuisine, and activities—all at a fixed price—will lure many new first-time customers. Almost all of these vessels are operated under various international flags, in what has been a rapidly growing busi­ness, largely based out of Florida and California ports.

The world fleet is growing older. The breaking up and sinking of some 30 bulk carriers in 1991 has caused classification societies, insurers, and governmental agen­cies to focus on the adequacy and mate­rial condition of the world fleet of bulk­ers, many of which are overage.

Once again, the problem facing this in­dustry is pricing. Freight rates just barely support the present operations. It is out of the question for owners to order new ships when the likelihood of ever being able to pay off the mortgages is nil. Thus, the old ships continue to sail, some having bene­fited from service-life extension programs. Over the next few years, replacement ton­nage will have to be ordered. This is just beginning to happen.

Navy-Merchant Marine Relationship

While the Merchant Marine has often been described, with much justification, as the nation’s fourth arm of defense, there has been a perceptible shift of policy within the Navy to gain control of its own fleet of military transport ships. The im­plication is that it is becoming more dif­ficult for the Navy to rely on the Merchant Marine to meet its surge shipping needs when trouble breaks out and specific types of ships are needed quickly. This was demonstrated in Desert Shield and Desert Storm, when the Military Sealift Com­mand was required to charter a substan­tial number (approximately half the fleet) of foreign-flag ships to meet its transport commitments.

The trend toward greater sea trans­port control also is seen in the Navy’s 26 August 1991 Navy Strategic Sealift Im­plementation Plan to build its own fleet of roll-on/roll-off prepositioning ships, and in its desire to take control of the Ready Reserve Fleet from the Maritime Administration. It seems logical that the Department of Defense should control the assets it must use for national defense purposes. It is responsible for maintain­ing military supply lines. However, the complete segregation of Navy and Mer­chant Marine policy also raises unsettling questions. It is especially threatening to resolve this issue.

In 1991, the United States took great pride in its merchant mariners of all ages, from all over the country, who supported one of history’s fastest and largest mili­tary mobilizations and logistical opera­tions. The year also witnessed a signifi­cant reduction in ship accidents, oil spills, and other casualties.

While the overall economic perfor­mance of the Merchant Marine and mar­itime industry improved slightly, the prob­lem of high fixed costs and unsatisfactory levels of freight rates remains. The pres­sure on earnings is a major obstacle to re­placing older ships, and to bank financing to secure new shipbuilding contracts. Nev­ertheless, a number of operators have found profitable market segments for themselves. They have demonstrated that companies employing ingenuity and hard work can be successful in a very chal­lenging and competitive marketplace.

Robert Pouch is a consultant with Barber International a firm engaged in ship management and marine con­sulting for a fleet of 175 commercial vessels. Mr. Pouch served in the U.S. Naval Reserve as a com­missioned officer in positions involving Naval Con­trol of Shipping, Military Sealift Command, and am­phibious warfare. He is a graduate of the Maine Maritime Academy.

Digital Proceedings content made possible by a gift from CAPT Roger Ekman, USN (Ret.)

Quicklinks

Footer menu

  • About the Naval Institute
  • Books & Press
  • Naval History
  • USNI News
  • Proceedings
  • Oral Histories
  • Events
  • Naval Institute Foundation
  • Photos & Historical Prints
  • Advertise With Us
  • Naval Institute Archives

Receive the Newsletter

Sign up to get updates about new releases and event invitations.

Sign Up Now
Example NewsletterPrivacy Policy
USNI Logo White
Copyright © 2025 U.S. Naval Institute Privacy PolicyTerms of UseContact UsAdvertise With UsFAQContent LicenseMedia Inquiries
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
Powered by Unleashed Technologies
×

You've read 1 out of 5 free articles of Proceedings this month.

Non-members can read five free Proceedings articles per month. Join now and never hit a limit.