Skip to main content
USNI Logo USNI Logo USNI Logo
Donate
  • Cart
  • Join or Log In
  • Search

Main navigation

  • About Us
  • Membership
  • Books & Press
  • USNI News
  • Proceedings
  • Naval History
  • Archives
  • Events
  • Donate
USNI Logo USNI Logo USNI Logo
Donate
  • Cart
  • Join or Log In
  • Search

Main navigation (Sticky)

  • About Us
  • Membership
  • Books & Press
  • USNI News
  • Proceedings
  • Naval History
  • Archives
  • Events
  • Donate

Sub Menu

  • Essay Contests
    • About Essay Contests
    • Innovation for Sea Power
    • Marine Corps
    • Naval Intelligence
  • Current Issue
  • The Proceedings Podcast
  • American Sea Power Project
  • Contact Proceedings
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Media Inquiries
  • All Issues

Sub Menu

  • Essay Contests
    • About Essay Contests
    • Innovation for Sea Power
    • Marine Corps
    • Naval Intelligence
  • Current Issue
  • The Proceedings Podcast
  • American Sea Power Project
  • Contact Proceedings
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Media Inquiries
  • All Issues

Nobody Asked Me, But …

By Lieutenant Robert D. Newell, U. S. Navy
June 1990
Proceedings
Vol. 116/6/1,048
Article
View Issue
Comments

This html article is produced from an uncorrected text file through optical character recognition. Prior to 1940 articles all text has been corrected, but from 1940 to the present most still remain uncorrected.  Artifacts of the scans are misspellings, out-of-context footnotes and sidebars, and other inconsistencies.  Adjacent to each text file is a PDF of the article, which accurately and fully conveys the content as it appeared in the issue.  The uncorrected text files have been included to enhance the searchability of our content, on our site and in search engines, for our membership, the research community and media organizations. We are working now to provide clean text files for the entire collection.

 

Dust off that active sonar!

As the surface navy has come to rely on the best passive surface sonar sys­tem in the world, the SQQ-89, the use of active sonar for anything other than completing those all-important torpedo exercises and practicing at the Atlantic Undersea Test and Evaluation Center range has become taboo. Even more significantly, as our active sonar “stacks” have continued to gather dust, our efforts to develop better ac­tive antisubmarine warfare tactics seem to have slowed to a standstill.

The main argument against using active sonar is that it greatly increases the transmitting ship’s counterdetec­tability. When surface ships ping with their sonars, they give up the tactical advantage of covertness. This is a solid argument, especially when passive de­tection ranges are far greater than ac­tive ones, which often is the case when working against noisy targets. In this case, a surface ASW platform should not go active and risk giving away its position; it can remain covert and pas­sively detect and track a target at ex­tended ranges possible on a SQR-19 towed array.

But as the source levels of new So­viet submarines become lower and lower, and the passive figure-of-merit gets smaller with it, active detection ranges will become greater than passive ones. When this occurs, the tactical advantages of passive systems such as the SQQ-89, and the passive tactics that go along with it, fly right out the window. If active ranges exceed pas­sive ranges and allow a ship to detect a submarine outside her weapons enve­lope or torpedo danger zone, then why not go active? If active ranges are within a submarine’s firing zone (but greater than passive ranges), it is still better to prosecute a target actively and take the position of the aggressor, rather than passively searching for something you might never find. And finally, if passive and active ranges are similar, then a combined passive-active prosecution should be considered. The classification time of a passive contact could be greatly reduced if active sonar was used more often.

The risk to all this is counterdetec­tion, but if better active tactics were developed, this risk could be mini­mized. Most current active tactics in the surface navy are devised for dual or multiship active prosecutions. These tactics, such as the old faithful “plan red/plan black cordon,” are outdated, and, more importantly, will not be ef­fective in the single-ship, one-on-one active ASW that we will need in the future. The active equipment and assets we currently have on our ships are good; we just need to think up new ways to use them. The LAMPS-III, for example, although designed to localize passive targets at long range, could be just as effective acting as a pouncer for a ship’s active contacts. The hulh mounted SQS-53B sonar can actively detect and track contacts at conver­gence zone ranges. But the use of these and other assets in this manner is mostly ignored.

The surface navy cannot afford to rest on the success and achievements that a system such as the SQQ-89 has made in passive ASW. Against the right targets and when deployed in the right environment, this type of passive ASW and its inherent covertness will always be the best way to hunt subma­rines. But the quietness of new classes of Soviet attack submarines also re­quires us to re-energize our active so­nars and to develop new single-ship active tactics. If we do not, the surface navy will once again fall behind the power curve in ASW and be forced to leave this vitally important warfare area to the submariners.

NEWLY

COMMISSIONED?

Let us introduce you to membership in your professional organization with 3 FREE issues of Proceedings.

All newly commissioned officers and -warrant officers in the Navy, Marine Corps, and Coast Guard are eligible.

For information and si

Membership Services U.S. Naval Institute Annapolis, MD 21402 301/268-6110

Ship and Aircraft

Photographs

Available

Choose from more than 35,000 photos dating back to 1883!

For order form and information write to:

Photo Service U.S. Naval Institute

Annapolis, Maryland 21402 (301) 268-6110


Proceedings / June 1990

Digital Proceedings content made possible by a gift from CAPT Roger Ekman, USN (Ret.)

Quicklinks

Footer menu

  • About the Naval Institute
  • Books & Press
  • Naval History
  • USNI News
  • Proceedings
  • Oral Histories
  • Events
  • Naval Institute Foundation
  • Photos & Historical Prints
  • Advertise With Us
  • Naval Institute Archives

Receive the Newsletter

Sign up to get updates about new releases and event invitations.

Sign Up Now
Example NewsletterPrivacy Policy
USNI Logo White
Copyright © 2025 U.S. Naval Institute Privacy PolicyTerms of UseContact UsAdvertise With UsFAQContent LicenseMedia Inquiries
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
Powered by Unleashed Technologies
×

You've read 1 out of 5 free articles of Proceedings this month.

Non-members can read five free Proceedings articles per month. Join now and never hit a limit.