This html article is produced from an uncorrected text file through optical character recognition. Prior to 1940 articles all text has been corrected, but from 1940 to the present most still remain uncorrected. Artifacts of the scans are misspellings, out-of-context footnotes and sidebars, and other inconsistencies. Adjacent to each text file is a PDF of the article, which accurately and fully conveys the content as it appeared in the issue. The uncorrected text files have been included to enhance the searchability of our content, on our site and in search engines, for our membership, the research community and media organizations. We are working now to provide clean text files for the entire collection.
The nature of combat at sea has changed enormously since the last great war ended 34 years ago. The nature of the Coast Guard’s peacetime responsibilities has changed just as drastically. As a result, even though antisubmarine warfare and gunfire support were that Service’s principal roles in wars past, many of the Coast Guard’s current ships and aircraft are not well suited to current antisubmarine and gunfire support tasks. Perhaps the only important exceptions are the twelve ships of the 29-knot Hamilton class of high endurance cutters, two of which, the Morgenthau (WHEC 122) and the Dallas (WHEC 716), are seen, opposite, racing through the calm seas of the Caribbean off Guantanamo Bay. Because their sensors and weapons come mainly from another era they may shortly be replaced. However, there is evidence that the wartime Coast Guard’s roles will be different from those in the past.
Te U. S. Navy has fewer men, fewer ships, and fewer resource5 of all sorts than it has had for a long time. Moreover, when one looks at the modest number of ships whose construction is begun in any given year, it becomes clear that in war, the Navy would be glad to get all the help it could find.
The most immediate source of help, consisting of officers an enlisted people, trained, disciplined, armed, and always ready, ** the U. S. Coast Guard. There are 37,000 officers and enlist people on active duty in the Coast Guard, ready to respond to the needs of the country afloat, aloft, and ashore.
Coast Guard cutters and their forerunners, the ships of the Rev" enue Cutter Service, have taken part in every major conflict since 1799 when Congress decreed, albeit not too grammatically, “Revenue Cutters shall, whenever the President of the Unke States shall so direct, cooperate with the Navy of the Unite States.”
After more than 100 years of operation, the future of the ReV' enue Cutter Service was threatened by a commission appointed t0 investigate the organization of the federal bureaucracy. That com mission recommended in 1912 that the Revenue Cutter Service b<j abolished, that its duties be divided among other agencies, an that its cutters be manned by civilians.
This led to a counterproposal, that the Revenue Cutter Service be combined with another maritime organization, the Life Savinf Service, to form a “coast guard.” With war erupting in Europe the counterproposal to strengthen the service as an armed fofCe appealed to Congress and, on 28 January 1915, President Wil5°n signed the Act to Create the Coast Guard. Among other things’ the act declared that the Coast Guard "... shall constitute a PafC of the military forces of the United States and which shall operate under the Treasury Department in time of peace and operate as a part of the Navy, in time of war or when the President shall s° direct. . .”
In July 194 1 Congress again stated: “The Coast Guard shall be a military service and constitute a branch of the land and navy for<Ts of the United States at all times. ...”
The act that transferred the Coast Guard to the new Departmef|t of Transportation in October 1966 contained the same statement-
What the Coast Guard Has Done
On 6 April 1917, the United States went to war with Germany. With the sending of a short coded message (“Plan 1, Acknowledge.”) all Coast Guard officers, men, cutters, and stations were transferred immediately to the Navy.
At once, the Navy grew by 5,200 officers and men, along with 25 cruising cutters, 20 harbor cutters, and 280 lifeboat stations. These were neither mobilized reserve units nor untrained recruits, but experienced mariners manning operational units complete with a structure of 17 regional commands and four logistic depots.
The cruising cutters were fitted with heavier armament than they needed in peacetime and some were assigned to convoy escort duties in the North Atlantic. Six were ordered to Gibraltar and escorted shipping between the British Isles and the Mediterranean. Other cutters escorted shipping in United States and Canadian coastal waters, in the vicinity of the Azores, and in the Caribbean.
As the U-boat attacks intensified, men from the lifeboat stations were called upon frequently to rescue the crews of ships torpedoed along the coast of the United States.
When the war came to an end it was clear that, in proportion to their number, the men of the Coast Guard had suffered more casualties than any other branch of the Armed Forces.
Twenty years passed and then the world went to war again. Five days after Hitler’s invasion of Poland in September 1939, President Roosevelt declared the neutrality of the United States.
The Coast Guard was made responsible for preventing warlike acts within U. S. waters by merchant vessels of any country and, to this end, the Service began extensive patrols both by aircraft and by cutters. Coastal stations also participated. Every foreign vessel entering U. S. waters was identified, boarded, and inspected. Merchant ships of belligerent countries had their radios sealed while within those waters.
In June 1940, after the fall of France and the Low Countries, the President invoked the powers conferred on him by the Espionage Act of 1917, which permitted him to control the movement of all vessels, both foreign and domestic, in the waters of the United States. Thus began the Coast Guard’s role in port security. The Service was empowered not only to inspect any vessel in U. S. waters at any time, but also to place guards on board the ships, or to remove the crews.
As submarine and surface attacks on North Atlan
tic shipping grew, Coast Guard cutters sharing neU' trality patrols with the Navy (mainly in waters o Greenland) frequently were called upon to rescue the survivors of sunken ships. Ten of the Services 5 cruising cutters were turned over to the Royal Navy- At 2,000 tons standard displacement, capable of 1 knots, and armed with two 5-inch guns as well as depth charges, they were ships well suited to escort work. .
Then, on 1 November 1941, the President th rected that the Coast Guard operate under the Navy- The order of the President provided the Navy an additional 27,000 trained officers and men, with 26 cruising cutters, 49 coastal patrol cutters, many smaller craft, 56 airplanes, and a host of shore sta tions. The long-standing close coordination between the Navy and the Coast Guard in training, supP^j. and communications made the organizational shift 0 this magnitude possible with little disruption to the functions of either Service.
All cutters and patrol boats capable of offshore op erations were provided additional weapons and etn ployed in convoy escort and patrol duties. As the waf intensified, Coast Guard crews manned not only their own Service’s ships, but also some of the Navy destroyer escorts and all the Navy’s frigates. In r'ie Atlantic, cutters, patrol boats, and other Coas1 Guard-manned ships sank ten U-boats, and a Coast Guard aircraft sank an eleventh. ^
The Coast Guard was called upon to train an provide crews for landing craft, and to man amphih1^ ous ships, transports, tankers, and supply ships- all, the Coast Guard manned 351 of the Nav)'s ships, 288 of the Army’s, and 802 of its own- 0 consequence, almost half of the Coast Guar
170,0 officers and men served afloat.
Port protection became a major function. A facilities were patrolled to prevent sabotage. Port se curity specialists, supplemented by 45,000 temP0^ rary members of the Coast Guard Reserve, supervise the handling and loading of explosive cargoes.
The addition of wartime duties did not mean an end to peacetime tasks. As thousands of distress ca were received, rescue activities were expand greatly. Over 1,500 survivors of torpedoed shipj were rescued along the Atlantic and Gulf coasts an in the Caribbean, and more than 4,000 more in t^e Atlantic and Mediterranean. Many 83-foot wooden hulled patrol cutters were assigned rescue duties 6°r ing the invasion of France at Normandy. Under f're from German guns, these swift little craft picked UP 1,568 survivors of sunken landing craft.
Another peacetime mission which grew during war was that of providing aids to navigation, °°
So
CaUed
*n s‘2e> to about 35,000 officers and men.
b ^ uoys and similar devices of local importance, wh' :1S° neW’ l°ng'range electronic systems, of ^ Loran proved to be the most successful. tj e tas*<s, of the civilian Bureau of Marine Inspec- q anc^ Navigation were transferred to the Coast
As 1 *n from the Department of Commerce,
the reSu^’ r^e Coast Guard inspected and certified lie COnstruction of all merchant ships, and it Seani an^ cert'^'e<^ nnerchant officers, pilots, and du ' Cn these programs were much more active
Ing the war than they had been beforehand.
Was° *°wtng the end of the war, the Coast Guard
Onl em°hdized and in 1947 its size had sunk to
18,687 officers and men.
the (Llr'n8 t'le Korean conflict, which began in 1950, Ports °aSt ^Uar<^ teturned to the task of safeguarding Co S' ^arb°rs> and waterways. In all major cities a p0rtSt ^uard officer was appointed Captain of the ets ' an<^ tfariners, pilots, and waterfront work- ris-e checked to insure that they were not security
Ushecp^'ti011’ r^ree new ocean stations were estab-
t*0n ln C^e ^ac‘^c t0 Prov*de SAR and communica-
info Services as well as accurate and reliable weather
trnation to the ships and aircraft headed toward *vorea Tu t
-j, itle Loran system was expanded. b]e(j . these needs, the Coast Guard was dou- /*e 15 years later, in 1965, the Coast Guard was
fro upon to help prevent weapons and supplies sive reach'ng the Viet Cong by sea along the extends °uth Vietnamese coast. The mission called for l0ty SrnaH enough to work in South Vietnam’s shal- petlc|COastal waters but large enough to cruise inde- Cuarjnt^ ancl to carry a heavy armament. The Coast typn met t*le neecl by deploying 26 new 82-foot Th^atrol boats.
ScjUa^e Selbsustained craft, comprising Coast Guard *eathe7n°ne’ were able to operate in almost any er> unsupported, for periods of up to a week.
They carried a trigger-fired, flat-trajectory 81-mm mortar and five .50-caliber machine guns. In less than three months from the decision to deploy them, 17 of these craft were armed, equipped, provided with trained crews, and on duty in Vietnam’s waters. They formed the inner barrier of Operation Market Time (TF 115). An additional nine WPBs and many 54-foot Navy Swift boats followed a few months later.
The 82-footers patrolled coastal and river waters in search of junks and sampans filled with enemy arms, ammunition, and supplies. In addition to disrupting Viet Cong supply lines, the WPBs were called upon frequently to provide gunfire support for ground forces, to participate in amphibious raids, to evacuate wounded men, and to conduct psychological warfare missions.
Beginning in 1967, a squadron of five high endurance cutters was formed to participate in the outer barrier of Market Time. Commonly, these
from
earned advanced degrees in engineering, many
agement, or legal training. Some also have attem the National, Naval, Army, or Air war colleges, Industrial College of the Armed Forces, or Armed Forces Staff College.
Those officers and warrant officers specializing Marine Safety undergo three years of training order to qualify as marine inspectors. Classro1 training is interspersed with practical experience the field. About 700 officers and warrant ofnc have completed or are now taking marine sai ^ training. Once qualified, they can expect to rem in that field for most of their careers.
The commissioned warrant officer corps is nun1
de
esc
ships also provided gunfire support for friendly forces ashore. They served until the end of American participation in the war. Many of the 36 high endurance cutters the Service then possessed served in the squadron, some for several tours.
New Loran C stations were established in Southeast Asia to provide highly accurate navigational assistance to our ships and aircraft. A buoy tender provided for local navigational aids. Explosive loading teams supervised and assisted in the handling of the vast quantities of ammunition being shipped to Vietnam. A merchant marine detail, attached to the embassy in Saigon, assisted with the investigation of merchant vessel and personnel casualties. And some Coast Guard helicopter pilots (but no Coast Guard aircraft) conducted rescue missions with the Air Force’s “Jolly Green Giants.”
When the United States withdrew from Vietnam, all 26 WPBs and four old 311-foot high endurance cutters were turned over to the South Vietnamese.
What the Coast Guard Has
Let us examine and evaluate the resources that are available now. We will start with people, and then follow up with cutters, aircraft, and shore units.
Officers and Enlisted Personnel
The most important resource that the Coast Guard has to offer is its trained and ready people. Admiral Owen W. Siler summarized the value of the Service’s
37,0 active duty and 12,000 selected reserve men and women in his article, “Tradition of Excellence, Time of Change,” in the March 1976 Proceedings: “While we have many professional specialists, we are essentially generalists, trained in many skills and ready to serve in many roles.”
Officers The active duty officer corps consists of 4,750 commissioned officers and 1,350 commissioned warrant officers.
Nearly all of the officers beyond the grade of lieutenant junior grade, and all warrant officers, hold regular commissions. About one-half of the officers in the lower two grades are reservists serving a three-year tour of active duty.
Warrant officers aside, 55 percent of the officers are graduates of the Coast Guard Academy at New London, Connecticut. Another 20 percent came up through the ranks. The remaining 25 percent are former reserve officers who now hold regular commissions, or reservists on active duty contracts. There are 900 cadets at New London, from whom come 200 ensigns annually. The Reserve Training Center
at Yorktown, Virginia, annually commissi°nS another 150 men and women. .
The level of sea experience among the officers lS high, some 70 percent of those beyond the first t"° grades having had duty on board one or more cut ters. Of these, about 25 percent have served as com manding officers afloat. With the deep slash a fe'v years ago in the number of major cutters, both thes(j figures may decline. Currently, only 14 percent 0 the 4,750 officers and 18 percent of the 1,350 rant officers are serving afloat. (The percentage of 0 ficers in aviation billets is similar—17.) The Com mandant has indicated his strong desire to maintam the Service’s seagoing nature and has continued tl>e policy of assigning all Academy graduates to duty afloat immediately after commissioning in ships 0 180 feet in length or longer. About 15 percent 0 newly commissioned reserve officers are also sent sea upon commissioning, while a similar portion gc into aviation. ^
While Coast Guard officers possess a range skills needed to perform in several general m‘sSl0J areas, over 60 percent of those beyond their im11 tour of duty have also undergone considerable l°n£ term specialized training. One quarter of them h‘lV the Naval Postgraduate School at Monterey. Anoth^ quarter have completed flight training at PensaC and additional Coast Guard instruction at the Av*^ tion Training Center in Mobile, Alabama. Of
other officers, most have obtained industrial, na*111
•ided the
the
oh1
in
up of officers in twelve specialties, the three larg __ of which are boatswain, naval engineering, and tronics. Together these constitute 60 percent of warrant corps, divided about evenly among ^ three. The next largest specialty is finance and snP^ ply, followed by personnel administration. The ^ maining 15 percent of the corps is divided am0 ^ seven smaller specialties. The large number of vV ^ rant officers in the Coast Guard provides the Ser with continuity in their specialty areas.
n lste^ Alerc and Women There are 31,000 enlisted 111611 and women on active duty, of whom about 775 re women. Two-thirds of the enlisted are petty offi- 6rs’ serving in 27 different ratings. Each year 7,500 n and women enlist and are trained at one of two tuit training centers, Cape May, New Jersey, and Alameda, California.
the there was a drop in recruiting following
l-6 en<^ the Vietnamese conflict, that is well be- us> and for some time the Coast Guard has ex- enced no significant difficulties in recruiting ■ "cabber young men and women. The training en the newly enlisted personnel is similar to that a 6n t^le Navy’s recruits. It lasts nine weeks and, ng other things, includes military drill, range _ ,lce’ the Uniform Code of Military Justice, and
Small boat handling.
About 4,000 of the non-rated personnel are pro- cjas6 every year to the grade of petty officer third SeVentyfive Percent °f these have completed p ss A school. Coast Guard petty officer schools at errio Urna, California, Yorktown, Virginia, and Gov- ra(.. rs ^land, New York, provide training for most the ^S’ ^Ut Nayy scbools are used to train four of techaVlation ratings, as well as quartermasters, sonar lcians, and fire control technicians. Those for ^oted a SC^00^ ^as not been established are pro- jc on the basis of their performance in serv- strjk 6 exarr>inations and their practical training as
Advanced petty officer training is conducted in 300 different short-term Class C schools, of which more than half belong to the Navy. The others are schools belonging to the Coast Guard, other Services, or industry. At least one-third of the Coast Guard’s petty officers attend a Class C school every year, and some attend more than one.
Current cutter manning is about 20 percent below wartime complements, but enough men of the required rates are available either on shore duty or in Reserve shipboard augmentation units to bring the cutters up to complement. In wartime regular petty officers of the required ratings serving ashore would be relieved by Reservists to provide additional seagoing rates for shipboard duty.
The first-tour reenlistment rate currently is 25 percent. The rate for subsequent enlistments is 77 percent. This permits the Coast Guard to maintain an adequate petty officer rate distribution to meet peacetime needs.
Unlike petty officers and noncommissioned officers in the other Services, Coast Guard petty officers share with commissioned and commissioned warrant officers a specific responsibility to enforce U. S. laws on the high seas and waters over which the United States has jurisdiction. In consequence, all petty offi-
independently. The number and characteristics of different classes of cutters are shown in the accon1 panying table.
To carry out the Coast Guard’s missions, the Sefv ice’s cutters normally must be able to operate m pendently of resupply support. Because of this, usU ally they are slower than naval vessels, but havC greater range and endurance than the latter.
gas-turbitte
:-ontrollable
cers must have both a general knowledge of Coast Guard law enforcement duties and a specific knowledge of the laws their particular duties require them to enforce.
The Reserve The Coast Guard Ready Reserve, about
22,0 strong, is made up of two separate elements, the Selected Reserve and the Individual Ready Reserve. The former consists of 11,700 men and women in a paid drill status, while the latter consists of about 10,000 persons, most of whom, having completed their tour of active duty, still must serve in the reserve to satisfy their statutory obligation. They do not drill, but do carry a pocket card with their mobilization assignment, and the Coast Guard keeps them informed on Service matters in general and Reserve matters in particular.
Port security is the wartime mission of 80 percent of the reservists. The remainder are assigned to augment cutter crews, to assist in forward area search and rescue, to help in aids to navigation tasks, and to take part in general administrative work.
In September 1977 the 210-foot cutter Reliance, assigned to the reserve training center at Yorktown, underwent refresher training with 30 percent of her crew replaced by reservists. The ship made the second highest score of the year among all Navy and Coast Guard vessels.
In 1971 the emphasis in reserve training was shifted from classroom lectures to participation in regular Coast Guard missions. The new concept has been highly successful not only because it provides practical operational training but also because it fosters an excellent state of readiness and a spirit of cooperation and appreciation between regulars and reservists.
The high state of morale at the reserve units is one of the major benefits of the new concept. The reservists have a sense of accomplishment and belonging which was not possible with a program consisting mainly of classroom training. The evidence of this increased morale and interest is the fact that nowadays over 90 percent of the Selected Reserve is made up of volunteers.
Early in 1973 an extensive exercise was conducted to determine the readiness of the Coast Guard Reserve. Each member of the Selected Reserve was queried to determine his availability for call to active duty. The result showed that over 95 percent were available and ready to report within three days. All units reported they could be fully operational within 15 days. In 1976 the Individual Ready Reserve reported a 70 percent readiness to report within 30 days.
These exercises indicated that there would be a shortage of 4,000 personnel to fill mobilization bi lets. If the authorization and funding were availably it is anticipated that this number could be recruite without much difficulty. In the meantime, the shortage would be met by recalling retired personne and insuring that important billets were filled first;
The Office of Reserve is able to invest its funds 111 training rather than in hardware because most of the reserve units are located with operational units an_ this reduces the need for training facilities specl ically for the reservists. However, there are some training centers and about 120 boats of various sizeS used by reservists where there are no regu^ facilities, or where their use by reservists won interfere with the accomplishment of regular sions.
Cutters ,
There are about 240 cutters of over a dozen di ferent types, ranging in size from the 13,000 c°^ and 399 feet of the Polar class icebreakers to the tons and 65 feet of the smaller inland buoy tended- All have an assigned personnel allowance and habita bility for extended operating by their permanent y assigned crews. As proved in Vietnam, this provi even the smallest of them with the ability to opetate
High Endurance Cutters The twelve modern 378-f°° high endurance cutters of the Hamilton class haV great potential for conventional operations with c Fleet in time of war and they participate regularly 1 exercises.
Powered by a combined diesel and propulsion system, and equipped with pitch propellers, these ships are very handy. Frt>n dead in the water they can reach a speed of 29 kn( in less than two minutes, and they can stop fr0^ that speed in less than two ship lengths. They have range of 14,000 nautical miles at 1 1 knots and 1 2,400 miles at 29 knots.
The 378s are equipped with SQS-38 sonar, hull-mounted version of the VDS SQS-35. It higher-frequency, shorter-ranged sensor than are SQS-23, -26, and -53, and, in shallow waters R likely to be more effective than the others. Each 0
pie 'eS S'X torpedo tubes in two Mark 32 tri
mounts for the Mark 44 or Mark 46 antisub- He i rorpedo. Once they carried a pair of re keh°gs> but those obsolete weapons have been lari>~Ve<^ flight deck can handle helicopters
as
their future usefulness in such a role is doubt- °netheless, it is anticipated that they will re-
ful
flightaS r^e H ^Ut n0t comfortably- While the
thei/ *S *ar®e enough t0 handle the Lamps helo, ‘ble Sensor ar|d weapon systems are not now compat- Pro bamPs- The ships’ systems could be im-
f0rth so as t0 operate the Lamps I, but not the Sear C<)rn'n8 Lamps III. They are equipped with ECM is r atlC^ bave extensive communications facilities. It he ■ °nable to expect that in war these ships would form tegratt'd quickly into the Navy’s antisubmarine syste lons- A study of the class’s sensor and weapon "’ill t,S W'd begin shortly. Presumably, the systems pro- ■ en be improved in accordance with the ships’ encgutted missions and the threats they are likely to
V’/^g °f these ships mounts a single outmoded re[3| <>n che forecastle and conceivably that will be
8 k Ce<a ^ a more modern weapon. The pair of brid^01 rnortars once found just forward of the Th^ WaS removed some time ago. f0ot ere are five of the very old steam-driven 327- wereCUtters st'd *n commission. While these ships bPro excebent antisubmarine units in World War II,
kflijsp r , . _
their °r their Sreat age, their outdated sonars, deri. rn°dest endurance, and their lack of a helicopter
. '-7 their , , . ■ , , ■ N main in commission until 1980, even though all are now over 40 years of age. They could still be used effectively for command and control of patrol boats. In Vietnam, they were used for offshore barrier operations and often provided gunfire support with their single 57.38.
The elderly 311-foot cutter Unimak was recommissioned recently to assist in the enforcement of the new 200-mile fisheries zone. Designed for the Navy before World War II as a seaplane tender, the diesel-driven Unimak might still be able to serve as a tender for small craft. One 327-footer is in reserve. She shares the qualities of the five still in commission. Until 1976 the Coast Guard kept five 255-foot steam-driven cutters in reserve, but these stubby ships are now gone.
Medium Endurance Cutters Sixteen 210-foot medium endurance cutters are in commission. These ships, though small, are provided with a helo deck suitable for a light helicopter, and are used extensively in law enforcement and search and rescue missions. They
Class By Length | No. | Built | Displ. | Beam | Draft | Propulsion | Fit. Deck | S crews 1 S.H.P. | Max. Speed | Piactt""1 | |
378' | 12 | 1967-72 | (High Endurance Cutters WHEC) 3,050 42' 20' Diesel | Yes | 2/36,000 | 29 | * 2 MkJi 15"/38 | ||||
|
|
|
|
| Reduction or Gas Trbn |
| 2/6,200 |
| |||
| |||||||||||
327' | 5 | 1936-37 | 2,656 | 41' | 15' | Turbo Reduction |
| 19.8 | |||
2/6,080 | 1 ft* | ||||||||||
311' | 1 | 1942 | 2,800 | 41' | 14' | Diesel Reduction |
| 19 | |||
|
|
399' | 2 | 1975-76 | 13,190 | 86' | 31' | Combined Diesel Electric | Yes | 3/78,000 | 21 | 2 $ |
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| or Gas Trbn | - |
|
| 2 40 2 40 2 40 |
| |||||||
310' 290' 269' | 1 1 2 | 1954 1944 1944-46 | 8,449 5,252 6,515 | 74' 74' 64' | 29' 19' 29' | Diesel Electric Diesel Electric Diesel Electric | Yes Yes Yes | 2/21,000 3/10,000 2/10,000 | 17.6 18.7 16 |
| ||||||||
|
|
| — (Medium Endurance Cutters WMEC) |
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
270' | 2 Funded (26 Planned) | (Est.) 1981 | 1,630 | 38' | 13' | Diesel Reduction | Yes | 2/7,000 | 19.7 | |||||||||
230' | 1 | 1942 | 1,925 | 43' | 15' | Diesel Electric |
| 1/1,800 | 14 | |||||||||
213' | 1 | 1944 | 1,745 | 41' | 15' | Diesel Electric Reduction |
| 2/3,000 | 15.5 | 2 40/ 13"/Si 2 40/ | ||||||||
210' | 16 | 1964-69 | 1,007 | 34' | 10' | Diesel Reduction | Yes | 2/5,000 | 18 | |||||||||
regularly undergo Navy underway training and, like the high endurance cutters, use fleet training centers for the training of their people.
They were constructed with provision for a hull- mounted sonar. But there are no such systems currently in the U. S. inventory that would be suitable for mounting in these ships. Until one becomes available, perhaps from Norway or West Germany, the use of a towed array probably would be the best alternative if they were assigned an ASW mission.
The single 3"/50 mounted on the forecastle is adequate for law enforcement purposes, such as encouraging a reluctant drug smuggler to heave to, but would be useless against almost any conceivable military aircraft or missile. As a result of the ships’ shallow draft, the selection of a suitable replacement mount is difficult. Because of its effect on stability, any additional topside weight must be strictly con
trolled. For this reason there is little room for chok in picking a rapid-fire weapon and control systelfl The 76-mm mount planned for the forthcoO1'0 270-foot medium endurance cutters cannot be commodated. While there is no acceptable repla_ce ment in the Navy system, there are several f°re1^__ and domestic lightweight smaller caliber gun terns that could provide an acceptable measure self-defense against air or missile attack. The 30'n j GAU-8 Gatling gun manufactured in the Un|te States by General Electric is one such. ^
These cutters are equipped with a full range j communications equipment. They have a range 6,100 miles at 14 knots and 2,700 miles at c^e maximum speed of 18 knots. ^
Six old former Navy seagoing tugs (ATF and S ^ are also classified as medium endurance cutters afl^ used by the Coast Guard for offshore patrol duties^
ci,
95'
82'
110'
85'
' ass By C^gtb
205'
143'
No. | Built | Disbl. | Beam | Draft | Fit. Propulsion Deck | Screws! S.H.P. | Max. | Peacetime |
| (Medium Endurance Cutters WMEC) Con’t. |
|
|
| ||||
3 | 1939-45 | 1,731 | 39' | 17' | Diesel Electric | 1/3,000 | 16.2 | 1 3"/50 |
|
|
|
|
| Reduction |
|
| 2 40 mm |
2 | 1945 | 860 | 34' | 14' | Diesel Electric | 1/1,500 | 13.5 | 1 40 mm |
|
| Reduction |
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
| jfUJL, 1—! | urgc W L LJ /------------------------------------ |
|
|
|
22 | 1953-59 | 105 | 20' | 6' | Diesel | 2/2,324 | 20 | 1 .50 cal. |
|
|
|
|
| Reduction |
|
| Machine gun |
53 | 1960-70 | 66 | 18' | 6' | Diesel | 2/1,600 | 23 | 1 .50 cal. |
|
|
|
|
| Reduction |
|
| Machine gun |
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
| ( I I lev f i/UT Jl wEJ « 1 VI Eld l id III rr 1 JL L rl J |
|
|
| |||
4 | 1979 | 662 | 37.6' | 12' | Diesel Electric | 1/2,500 | 14.7 | Machine guns |
U5 planned) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 | 1939-43 | 370 | 27' | IT | Diesel Electric | 1/1,000 | 11.2 |
|
1 | 1944 | 230 | 23' | 9' | Diesel Direct | 1/700 | 9.5 |
|
(Harbor Tug, Small WYTL)-
Total of 15 65' class — (Buoy Tenders, Seagoing WLB)- 1,025 37' 13' Diesel Electric
1/1,200 13 4 armed with
1 3750 Remainder have 40 mm Machine guns
lot/ Tmders- Coastal WL alofl5
ffi,
133' to 177'
) J Tenders, Inland lVI
(Construction Tenders, Inland WLIC) Total of 10 75'
(Buoy Tenders. River WLR)
Total of 18 65' to I 15'
(Lightships WLV)
Total of 3 128'
(Training Ships lVIX)
Total of 1 295' Sailing Vessel
small i
vvat;e '^breaker, the 230-foot Storis, used in Alaskan ’ Was reclassified some years ago as a medium vvhicyjanCe cutter- She is armed with a single 3”/50, the C ^as keen used to protect Alaskan waters from 'j.^ncroachments of illegal foreign fishing vessels.1 rnecj. 6 ^rst two of a projected class of 26 270-foot t*0nalUrn en<^urance cutters are expected to be opera- ^uar 1 *n These ships will both meet Coast
ahd peacetime needs for law enforcement, search rescue, and environmental protection, and be
' Cr an ex
Central °f this, sec James W. Moreau, “The Coast Guard in the
hp. 277 278)^eStern ^aC,^c’ Broteedio^s (Naval Review issue, May 1973, able to make a significant contribution to the Navy’s antisubmarine capabilities.
They will be able to accommodate all Coast Guard helicopters, the Navy’s current ASW helos (including the SH-3), and the forthcoming Lamps III. A telescoping hangar will permit the deployment of helos on board (it will not accommodate fhe SH-3) for extended periods. Fin stabilization (something their bigger sisters lack) and a new recovery, securing, and traversing system will enable air operations to be conducted in heavy weather.
The vessels will carry the new Mark 75 76-mm gunmount and the Mark 92 fire control system, and will have space and weight reserved for a close-in air
!War
A boarding crew from the Sherman sets off to visit a vessel suspected of breaking the law. Early in any major war, similar tasks may often fall to the Coast Guard as hostile fishing vessels in nearby waters are seized and brought into port. Notice the 81-mm mortar in the background. This weapon has since been removed.
defense system, perhaps Phalanx. They will also have provision for Harpoon if it is needed. For ASW, the ships will be equipped with a towed passive tactical sonar and modular sensor system. They will have a modest top speed of a bit less than 20 knots, with an endurance at that speed of 4,500 miles. At 14 knots they will be able to cruise 8,400 miles without refueling which will enable them to operate independently for extended periods. They will be able, of course, to refuel at sea. In peacetime they will normally carry provisions for a 21-day underway period.
Icebreakers This nation’s only surface ships capable of polar operations are the Coast Guard’s icebreakers. Two of them, the 13,000-ton Polar Star class, are new ships with highly sophisticated systems and combined diesel and gas turbine engines which, together, can deliver 78,000 shaft horsepower to three controllable pitch propellers. The Coast Guard has three other icebreakers capable of extended polar operations and one that, because of her fresh-water cooling system, is restricted to operations on the Great Lakes. Three of these are of World War II vintage. One replacement icebreaker will be requested in the budget for fiscal year 1980.
The Polar class was constructed without guns, and the World War Il-style armament on the other large icebreakers has been removed. The vintage weapons and ammunition added noticeably to the ships’ maintenance costs and personnel requirements. Removing them not only saved men and money but also gave the icebreakers greater freedom to carry out exploration and research in the Arctic, particularly north of Siberia. Moreover, by removing the guns from these ships, they are also able to avoid the international inspection requirements placed on armed ships operating in Antarctic waters.
Though the twin 5"/38 mounts formerly on the Glacier and the icebreakers of the Wind class could be reinstalled in the event of conflict, it is doubtful that they would really provide protection against air or missile attack. If current evaluations prove satisfactory, the new Polar class ships will mount a pair of single-barrel Mk 19 40-mm guns and a pair of .50 caliber machine guns to provide some self-defense.
There will be six interchangeable mounts for these weapons.
This small fleet provides the United States with a modest ice operating capability when compared w1 the Soviet Union which has more than 40 major breakers, but then to support commerce to and frofa I her many cold water ports that country needs ma more such ships than we do. Aside from a pair aS^ signed to aid commerce in the Great Lakes, our <c^ breakers are used mainly for support of Air Force sC^ tions in western and southwestern Greenland and 1 northern Alaska, and for support of scientific stat*0 in the Antarctic.
Patrol Craft There are 75 WPBs of the 82- and 9 ^ foot classes in operation. As we have seen, 26 82-'c Point class cutters were used in Vietnam, and 1 left there when the Americans departed. Tn
were
cutters proved to be both seaworthy and extrem ^ reliable under the demands of a high tempo opef‘l tion. In their first full year in Vietnamese watef^ they averaged 266 days underway on patrol, a v high level.
ely
The crew accommodations make these vessels
sustaining, without much need for shore supP'
and this provides a high degree of flexibility in
use.
lOd’
the‘r
The older class, the 95-footers, have a range j 3,000 miles at 9 knots and 460 miles at a full sPe^f of 20 knots. The 82-footers have a slightly grea^j maximum-speed range, 490 miles at 23 knots, ‘ about half the economical-speed range of the eaf class. Those that deployed to Southeast Asia naa
an1
■lief
potent, yet econom-
some time to come.
e transit from the Philippines to Vietnam with one erway refueling from an accompanying LST. s Is tyPe of vessel could be valuable in providing ri], ^°rt t0 countries threatened by terrorist or guer- a activities in coastal areas. The addition of a light ssi e system could make them aI’ resources.
lSrTf en^ers Some 30 seagoing buoy tenders of the estabi°0t C^aSS ^)u'*t during World War II are used to th^ an^ ma*ntain major aids to navigation su 0l|^^0ut tde waters of the United States, and to PP^y remote Loran and light stations, bow r^ese sbips were constructed with icebreaker
Ms and some have been modified with reinforced ' inat ability was put to good use in the recent on ,Wlnters’ not °nly in the Great Lakes, but also bo 6 ^aSt ^oast- Each is equipped with a 20-ton l°r buoy and cargo work.
stea Cause 31 economlcal speed (7.5 knots) they can ^ 13,000 miles and at maximum speed (13
S they can g° 4,500 miles, these tenders are and uSeC^ *n distant waters, such as those of Alaska r e Western Pacific. In addition to their other rriQte ’ niey provide fuel, water, and supplies to re- pjers Uruts- Because many of the stations are without ^each ten<^ers obrcn deliver their supplies in are Cra^t or *n floating pipelines. Though they reno ery old, many of these useful ships are being Suiteate<^ an<^ WC Can exPect rbem to be around for
'J’l
f0r e ^0asr Guard also has 65 other buoy tenders ran W°f^ ‘n coastal, inland, and river areas. They jn R^ln length from 65 to 177 feet. All are engaged ity '^-navigation work that requires boom capac- n some construction capability.
Carboy ' 1' -r, 1
There are 29 harbor tugs, including
thirteen 110-footers, which are used in domestic icebreaking and rescue work. Some of these will soon be replaced by a new class of 140-foot WYTMs. The first of a projected class of fifteen has been delivered.
The most significant improvements in the new class are their higher horsepower, greater speed, and increased range compared to their predecessors. They are also able to break substantially thicker ice.
In addition to icebreaking and search and rescue, the tugs are used for port safety and security, enforcement of laws and treaties, and marine environmental protection. The new cutters have a cruising range of 4,000 miles at 12 knots and a maximum speed of 14.7 knots.
All of the harbor tugs are self-sustaining, and could be relocated with a minimum of shore support to areas where new mission needs develop. In fact, during World War II some of the 110-footers were sent to Iceland. They steamed there from the East Coast and back on their own keels. Their towing qualities would be especially important in wartime.
Aircraft
Some 55 fixed-wing airplanes and 116 helicopters are in use, divided into four types classified by search and rescue functions: long range search, medium range search, medium range recovery, and short range recovery. The characteristics of the individual aircraft are shown in Table 2.
Long-Range Search The Lockheed HC-130 Hercules is a long-range, all-weather airplane that can operate from unprepared fields. It can carry 92 passengers or 35,000 pounds of cargo. Just as those of the other Services, in war Coast Guard C-130S could supply forward areas or remote stations.
Table 2
AIRCRAFT
N {K~----------- |
|
|
| Gross |
| Max. Speed! |
|
Model | Number | Crew | Weight | Engines | Range | Name | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HC-130 | 25 | 8 | 135,000 | 4 | 370/2,300 | Hercules | |
l HC-131 | 17 | 7 | 67,000 | 2 | 266/1,500 | Samaritan | |
1 HU-16E | 11 | 6 | 28,850 | 2 | 225/2,200 | Albatross | |
,1Range N» (Mrr> fy (SRR) | HU-25A | -41- | 5 | 30,000 | 2 | 450/1,500 | Falcon |
(Delivery 1980-81) HH-3F 37 | 3 | 21,959 | 2 | 156/300 | Pelican | ||
HH-52A | 79 | 3 | 8,100 | 1 | 109/474 | Sea-guard | |
^ture War | &nd the U. S. Coast Guard |
|
|
|
| 193 |
Under normal loading conditions—10 or 12 tons of cargo—a C-130B can fly 2,300 nautical miles at
290 knots. A C-130H with the same load can fly 3,300 nautical miles at 300 knots. At light fuel load a C-130 can fly at a speed of 325 knots, but, of course, only for a short distance. Under normal conditions, the C-130B can get by with 3,650 feet of runway and the H model, carrying the same load, with 3,200 feet. Most of the Service’s isolated stations can provide the necessary runway, though some light stations must be supplied by sea. In case of war, these aircraft could continue to be used for search and rescue or assume additional wartime duties. Their large cargo capacity would permit them to carry ASW or surveillance equipment.
Medium-Range Search The very old twin-engine HU-16 amphibian is still in use, and some will remain so until 1980. But 41 Falcon 20G aircraft are on the way, and all will be in use by 1981. The new aircraft, designated HU-25 A, has many advantages over the HU-16 it is replacing, but while the HU-16 can get aloft on 2,000 feet of runway, the new aircraft requires 5,000 feet.
The new twin-jet aircraft will have a top speed of 500 knots and the ability to cruise at less than 220 knots at a search altitude of 2,000 feet. The aircraft is to have an all-weather capability with an endurance that will permit it to proceed 150 mileS tl’ sea, cover 700 square miles in a low-level search, an return 200 miles to base. It will have a crew of f've and be equipped with forward-looking and side looking airborne radar, infrared/ultraviolet line scan ners, active-gated TV, and an aerial reconnaissance camera. The plane will have a 3,200-pound payl°a and be capable of airdropping emergency suppl*eS t(j. a distressed vessel. Its slow search speed will- 0 course, increase the chance of finding the soug1 people or objects.
The new aircraft will also have hardpoints for r mounting of pods for a variety of surveillance °r communications equipment.
Air Force for combat SAR. The Coast Guard’s aircfa resemble the Air Force version. With the addition
armor, an inflight refueling probe, and some tank alterations, it could be used to supplement
fuel
t^
the
latter mission. It would be more difficult to alter ^
HH-3F to meet the needs of ASW, which would 1 • • •
elude arranging for a dipping sonar to penetrate hull.
f
Medium-Range Recovery The HH-3F is an ampin 1 ous, twin-turbine helicopter with a range of ' ^ miles (which permits recoveries to be made as nnn as 300 miles from base—on occasion they have g°n^. 330 miles unsupported) and a maximum speed 0 142 knots. It is equipped with modern communR*1 tions, a computerized navigation system, and ca|J carry six to eight passengers, cargo, stretchers, so111 vehicles, or boats. It can land in waves of up to f°uf or five feet, and winds of up to about 20 knots. * Navy uses a version of this aircraft for ASW and 11
is usually accompanied by a fixed-wing
St;
cont
a*ntain boats and crews ready for rapid response stress calls. Sometimes, though not often, boats c ' &° °ut as far as 100 miles offshore. Usually a
t‘ trauy located group office coordinates the operaS ofa number of stations.
24 C s^orc units are supported and augmented by ari^air stations that can provide fixed-wing airplanes helicopters to conduct air searches as well as 1 and medium range recoveries. Long range
Search
tended
Provide
several
<*rine
M,
thort-Range Recnvery The largest number of aircraft at the Coast Guard has in operation is the single ^Ur *ne HH-52A. This light amphibious helo is being more and more for shipboard operations. It can Proceed 150 miles offshore at 90 knots, hover for 20 r®inutes or, if the sea is calm, land on the water, eCover four survivors, and return to base with re- rve fuel. Because it has only a single engine, the att is limited in the distance that it can operate
rr corted from ship or base. For extended missions °‘fshore, it a*rcraft.
These helos have proved very effective on the fish- os and drug interdiction patrols. t . e£’nning in 1980, the Service hopes to buy 90 craft~er9hne replacements for the HH-52A. The air- j sought after need not be amphibious, nor may Ca more than 10,000 pounds. But it must be e °f 100 kn'ots maximum speed, of inflight rein n^’ an<^ h°vermg thirty minutes while rescu- •j-j^ t^lree persons 150 nautical miles from station. e Squired crew size is three.
Sh°r* Facilities
e Coast Guard operates over 650 independent hav^ un’ts m this country and overseas. While most an assigned primary mission, many engage in or of -k°rt severa* different missions. A detailed listing 1 e different types and numbers of units is prein Table 3
and Rescue These stations on the United ates mainland, Puerto Rico, Alaska, and Hawaii dually monitor distress radio frequencies and
to
aircraft are centrally located to provide ex- C u E*r searc^ capability along each coast, in the bean, and in Alaskan and Hawaiian waters. °mbined with the air stations, the shore stations
a coordinated network that could accomplish in Wartime functions such as radiation monitor- to e^ectron*c surveillance of beaches, in addition e traditional life saving functions they have car- 0ut m the wars past.
Safety Port safety stations are responsible for
the security of ports and anchorages and for the movement of vessels within the waters of the United States. Their tasks include fire prevention and the supervision of the loading and unloading of explosives and other dangerous cargoes.
Marine inspection offices inspect and regulate vessels to provide for the safety of crews, passengers, and cargoes. These offices license and regulate merchant marine personnel as well as act to protect their rights. They approve plans for construction, repair, or modification of vessels, investigate accidents and casualties, and perform various other regulatory functions.
The functions of both the Port Safety Station and the Marine Inspection Office are being combined into marine safety offices which carry out both mis^ sions as well as that of marine environmental protection.
Vessel traffic services stations have been established in five major ports on the West and Gulf coasts. The first such in the East will be New York, in 1979. These, using radars and other sensors, provide advisory traffic information to vessels in heavily congested ports and waterways. Probably more such systems would be set up in wartime to help protect shipping in other ports.
Aids to Navigation To aid in the navigation of ships and planes, the Coast Guard provides a full range of services. They extend from the establishment and maintenance of small river buoys for the use of local traffic to the erection of Loran towers over 1,300 feet tall for the transmission of timed pulses that provide navigational accuracy to within a matter of feet for the worldwide navigation of our forces.
There are over 50 loran stations around the world transmitting signals for Loran A and Loran C systems. There are also chains operated by allied nations which receive technical assistance from the Coast Guard. A system of eight Omega stations has just been completed to provide additional electronic navigation capability throughout the world. The two in this country are operated by Coast Guard personnel. The remainder are operated by host nations with varying degrees of support from the United States. Though the Navy still has responsibility for this system, full management and operation of the program will be transferred to the Coast Guard in 1980.
While many lighthouses have been automated, there are still 87 manned light stations. Among the assorted groups supporting aids to navigation are 50 independent teams which provide a highly responsive capability for repairing and maintaining fixed aids.
Program
Aids to Navigation
Commercial Vessel Safety
Commercial Vessel Safety and Port Safety and Security
Marine Science Activities
Port Safety and Security
Radionavigation Aids
Unit
Aids to Navigation Teams
Depots
Bases
Light Stations Light Attendant Stations Fog Signal Station Radio Beacon Station
Marine Inspection Offices Marine Inspection Details
Marine Safety Offices
Number
50
16
23
87
7
13
2
34
Program Director
Office of Marine Environment
and Sys*1
ifltf ^earc
H,
eCff
Office of Merchant Marine Safety
Office of Merchant Marine Safety/ Office of Marine Environment and )
^sea
jene
Reserve Forces
Oceanographic Unit
Port Safety Stations Vessel Traffic Service Stations Captain of the Port
Activities Europe Loran Stations C Loran Stations A-C Loran Stations A Loran Monitor Stations Loran Test Facility Omega Stations Section Offices
Reserve Training Center Organized Reserve Training Centers
Office of Operations
Office of Marine Environment an'
d Syste
tr>git
1
20
8
25
6
1
8
4
1
14
Office of Marine Environment
Office of Reserve
and Sy*“
-°rnt
*"ian
p«rso
Hifi,
Support
To support the organization of the Coast Guard, both operationally and administratively, there are Headquarters in Washington, D. C., area offices on both the Atlantic and Pacific coasts, and 12 separate district headquarters throughout the country. There are also four overseas headquarters, one each in England, Puerto Rico, Guam, and Japan, to support and coordinate the activities of Coast Guard units in those areas.
Industrial support for operating units is provided by 23 bases, an aviation repair center at Elizabeth City, North Carolina, and the Coast Guard Yard. The Yard, located at Curtis Bay, Maryland, can maintain, repair, and modify all the Coast Guard’s ships and craft. It has built ships and boats, too. The largest such recently were four 210-foot medium endurance cutters.
Research to support Coast Guard programs an the development of required equipment is aL complished at the Research and Development Cen ter, Groton, Connecticut, and the Electron11- Engineering Center, Wildwood, New Jersey. The aL tivities of these units has increased recently with c^e great involvement of the Coast Guard in the detec tion and cleanup of oil pollution. The Electronns Center has been involved continually in the deve opment and improvement of electronic navigati(,n systems as well as in meeting the changing needs f°r communication capability. The Oceanographic Un’C in Washington, D. C., coordinates the Coast Guard’s involvement in oceanographic activities.
Communications support is provided by six larEe multipurpose and multimode communication sta tions and six smaller single-purpose or single-distr‘ct radio stations.
19170
y^gram
^ e^handRescue
tecre:
'at>onal Bo;
esearch
and
ating Safety
Development
Jer'eral a , .
Ministration
:n8im
eerin.
8 Suppi
ort
mmUmcations Services
Unit
Air Stations Air Base
Coastal SAR Facilities Aviation Training Center Group Offices Stations
Boating Safety Teams
Fire and Safety Test Facility Research and Development Center
Area Offices District Offices Headquarters
Aircraft Repair and Supply Center Electronics Shops Electronic Engineering Center Yard
Support Centers Resident Inspectors
Communications Stations Radio Stations
Supply Center
Academy Institute Training Centers
Ships Training Detachment
Strike Teams
Number
Program Director
24
1
7
1
50
154
12
1
1
Office of Operations
Office of Boating Safety
Office of Research and Development
2 Chief of Staff 12
1
1 Office of Engineering
8 1 1
5
3
5 Office of Operations
5
1 Office of the Comptroller
1 Office of Personnel
1
4
2 Office of Operations
3 Office of Marine Environment and Systems
H,
d
at l^e Coast Guard Can Do
^ha
r
c
e
:s
1-
n
if
it
rc lat Can the Coast Guard do in wartime with jCe ^ 0fces and their supporting structure? The Serv-
■e
i'
rrieet&S Seven Peacetime objectives, and attempts to of f them through 15 different programs. A review 'v°ul<JSC Prov'^e an indication of what duties ty() | , c°ntinued in time of war, when new tasks ^ also be assigned.
■j. e Peacetime objectives are: pro ttttnimize loss of life, personal injury, and and ft^ ^amaSe on- over, and under the high seas •platers subject to United States jurisdiction. t'0nal aC^'tate waterborne activity in support of na- •j, economic, scientific, defense, and social needs. Port assure the safety and security of vessels and of
far;i. and waterways and their related shoreside •nties.
'J'o
enforce federal laws and international
agreements on and under waters subject to the jurisdiction of the United States and on and under the high seas where authorized.
To maintain an effective, ready, armed force prepared for and immediately responsive to specific tasks in time of war or emergency.
To maintain or improve the quality of the marine environment.
To cooperate with other government agencies and entities (federal, state, and local) to assure efficient utilization of public resources and to carry out activities in the international sphere where appropriate in furthering national policy.
Of the fifteen programs, it is probable that ten would be continued and expanded during a conventional war, though in many cases, the emphasis would change.
These programs are:
(1.) Port Safety and Security, obviously a matter of
prime importance, and already discussed. (2.) Search and Rescue. As ships are sunk, the need for long-range SAR work is likely to grow. Some reserve components have been tasked to provide rescue coordinating personnel and men to augment the crews of long-range SAR vessels. Because pleasure boating would decline in war, the need for short- range SAR units would decline. The units now so employed would likely be diverted to port security work. (3.) Radio Navigation Aids and (4.) Short-Range Aids to Navigation. Long-range electronic systems for the accurate navigation of air, surface, and subsurface forces would be extremely important and probably the program would expand as it did in Korea and Vietnam. While the antenna arrays of these high power transmitting stations are highly vulnerable to destruction, there are methods of realigning the systems between widely separated stations. The demand for accurate short-range aids would increase as new anchorages, channels, and restricted areas were declared, and as shipping moved into very different patterns of activity from those followed in peacetime. (5.) Icebreaker Operations. No doubt the large icebreakers would be transferred to Navy support forces ar the outset of hostilities. They would probably be used for escort duty in northern waters and to establish and support remote units in the Arctic. In a war with any country except the Soviet Union, the escort of supply vessels to the oil fields on the northern slope of Alaska could be important. In a war with that country, certainly such traffic so near Soviet bases would cease. The domestic icebreakers would continue to be used to keep vessel traffic moving in the Great Lakes and northern ports. (6.) Commercial Vessel Safety. If a conflict lasted a long time, merchant ship building would expand and the need for mariners to man the new ships would lead to an increase in training programs. The approval of all construction plans and the need for inspections throughout construction would call for | duties and they would be shifted to other missions- (8.) Deep Water Ports Because of their vulnerabi ity, and that of the ships that they would service, t0 damage or destruction, ir is unlikely that offsh°r^ port facilities would continue to operate in time war. The danger of destruction, of course, wou have to be balanced against the need for petroled^1 and the protection that the ports could be provide ^ Other offshore assets, such as drilling rigs, w0li j also be vulnerable and it is probable that they won be abandoned during full scale conflict. (9.) Bridge Administration. It would be necessary continue this function so that both waterway a° road transportation systems were coordinated on subject of bridges over navigable waters to mainn*"1 proper priorities in support of a war effort. (10.) Marine Environmental Protection. The relative independence of the United States from the oceans aS a source of food and the comparative resilience orc marine areas in recovering from pollution sug£eSJ that activities in this program would be less critlCj in wartime than nowadays and would receive consi ^ erably less emphasis. Resources engaged in su duties would be diverted to more vital programs- (11.) Marine Science Activities. Oceanographic an scientific research activity would probably be ^[1] continued except where they would contribute to * military purpose, such as research into underwatej sound propagation and ocean layers. The personn and resources probably would be assigned to NaV^ oceanographic units. . (12.) Recreational Boating Safety. Activity in program would be substantially reduced and the re sources devoted to other missions such as port set1' rity’ X (13.) Military Operations, (14.) Military PrepctV ness, and (15.) Reserve Training, in war, two of theS three programs would become of primary imP°r tance, and the third would be absorbed in othefS such as port security. |
additional technical and inspection personnel in the | What the Coast Guard Might Do |
Coast Guard. More people would also be needed to administer the licensing of merchant marine officers and seamen. (7.) Enforcement of Laws and Treaties. In the period just before open hostilities, this could be a very important mission, as it was before World War II. Surface and air patrols could be used to insure the integ- | In addition to the traditional duties performed ^ the Coast Guard in past wars, such as convoy esCi jr and ASW patrol, and the anticipated extension ^ normal peacetime missions, there are some new 'nj tiatives for which the Coast Guard should be cons' ered. |
rity of our territorial waters or to protect treaty agreements made with other nations. But if open hostilities commenced, patrol aircraft and larger cutters would essentially end their law enforcement | Coastal Security j Concurrent with port security, the Coast Gualj could be made responsible for the surveillance atl |
1 GQ | . 10^ |
in t?Ct*wn activity in coastal waters. This could Ve rhe establishment and monitoring of fixed
theSOf SyStems’ r^e laying of defensive minefields, shC|con<^uct of air and surface patrols, the conduct of off h°'V Water ^W, and the protection of whatever CuS ore assets are defensible. Many of the Service’s rj C actlvities and resources indicate coastal secure asan appropriate wartime task. For example, the m °y . u°y tenders could be used to establish and Th ain COntr°lled minefields and sensor systems. ^ coastal stations could be integrated into a 0r ni^or*ng system to detect intruders, NBC agents, c 0t er dangers. Patrol boats, medium endurance tersterS W't^1 dight decks, patrol aircraft, and helicop- v'de °rerat*nS from dispersed air stations could proa • otd a*r surveillance and an attack capability £o enemy submarines or intelligence craft. er • ^!and and control of all these units could be ex- Se by existing area and district commands.
^^Enforcement Assistance
age^ e ^oast Guard’s status as a law enforcement dona/ W0U^ enable it to be used when a conven- s°nn 1 mUitary Presence might be undesirable. Per- jn ^ and equipment could assist friendly countries £u e developing world in combatting terrorists and erifo as- Coast Guard teams could act as law v'dedCement a<^v*sors’ or patrol units could be prolance °r enb°rcement assistance. Coastal surveil- bei an<^ interdiction of arms and contraband Priat SlT1U^^ed into a country would be an appro- te law enforcement mission. lS the battles could not stop to search for and rescue the survivors in the water. Important losses occurred during the Battle of the Coral Sea and during battles off Guadalcanal in 1942 and at Leyte Gulf in 1944, when the survivors of sunken ships were left in the water for days on end. Now, when manpower will be relatively a scarcer resource than it was. Coast Guard cutters and helicopters operating with task units could be used to save such people. The cutters could be provided with medical personnel and equipment rather than weapons, be painted white, and be marked appropriately as humanitarian rescue units. During battles or while engaged in rescuing survivors, they could transmit an electronic signal over a wide range of frequencies that would identify them and their mission to prevent them from being attacked. It would be necessary for warring nations to recognize and agree to respect the noncombatant nature of such rescue units.
As the cost of major weapons increases and the resources able to respond to lesser threats decline, it is important that the Navy be aware of Coast Guard resources and capabilities. Ties should be strengthened and naval plans should include the use of Coast Guard forces to accomplish the country’s objectives under a wide variety of conditions.
E'nnb,
D,
'at Rescue
fced/1^ ^ftld War II, thousands of men died men eSS*y when ships were sunk in battle. These c°uld have been saved, but the ships involved in
[1]^tes Surveillance
fln eCaUSC ^ore'gn fishing fleets in waters near the me C ^tates could gather intelligence, plant sub- ing f ^ WeaPons' or provide over-the-horizon target- Surfa r ITIlss^e attacks by enemy air, surface, or sub- Ce Un‘ts, the Coast Guard should be tasked with Crev^ei2ure °f these vessels and the interning of their at the outset of hostilities.
^Support
j0g C tttissile launchers and accurate remote targeting w°uld enable small cutters such as WPBs, work- agaj^ICd controlling aircraft, to provide fire support to rjsk an enerny ashore. This would reduce the need ashore eX^os'n8 large naval combatants to fire from