VIEW PROCEEDINGS ARCHIVES

 

Partnering to Safeguard the Seas
SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

USNI Image Gallery

U.S. Coast Guard (Thomas M. Blue)

The Senegalese navy's Poponquine patrols with the USCGC Legare (WMEC-912) in the Atlantic during August 2009 exercises under the auspices of the U.S.-sponsored Africa Partnership Station. The six-day joint operation provided boarding-party training to Senegalese sailors. While such programs are beneficial, the author asserts, they lack long-term sustainability.

U.S. Navy (Martine Cauron)

Nigerian sailor Maji Isah Ocheje demonstrates his knot-tying skills under the watchful eye of U.S. Coast Guard Chief Warrant Officer 3 Earl Schlemmer. The Nigerians were participating in a March 2010 small-boat operation workshop in Sekondi, Ghana, sponsored by the Africa Partnership Station.

U.S. Coast Guard (Patrick Kelley)

A crewmember on board the Jamaica Defence Force Coast Guard ship Middlesex stands watch as her vessel escorts the Dominican Republic Navy's Orion into Port Royal, Jamaica in April 2010. The ships were among those of 18 nations participating in an exercise that was part of the U.S. Southern Command's Enduring Friendship program.

Courtesy Armed Forces of Malta

Armed Forces of Malta Major Alex Dalli (gesturing) of the Maritime Safety and Security Training Center (MSSTC), interprets for a group of Algerian officers during a discussion of a search-and-rescue exercise that Algeria conducted in the autumn of 2008. Observing the exchange (far left) is U.S. Coast Guard Commander Brian Lisko. Lisko's presence as an observer was possible because of maritime relations formed through MSSTC.

Sean R. Schenk

USNI Image Gallery
Small Text
Regular Text
Large Text
 
U.S.-sponsored regional training centers would be an effective investment in global maritime security. Programs in Malta and Kenya provide the blueprint.

The U.S. military has a long tradition of training with partner nations to achieve mutually beneficial security goals. After the United States emerged from World War II as a superpower, that cooperation with foreign militaries was linked to containing Soviet communism. The post-9/11 world has demonstrated that continued international engagement is necessary, so training and cooperation with partner nations remains a critical part of U.S. engagement strategy, especially in the maritime domain. Our international maritime security goals can be achieved more effectively through sponsorship of host-nation, regional training centers. Such Cooperative Training Centers (CTCs) could:

 

 

 

  • Provide U.S missions abroad with concrete guidance for building support with host governments, key private-sector partners, and the general public abroad.
  • Establishing Cooperative Training Centers (CTCs) to maintain core competencies derived from U.S. training and expand the host country's ability to share operational knowledge on a regional basis would effectively meet all Outreach Plan objectives. There are three clear advantages to building capacity this way.

    First, the co-establishment of CTCs by the United States and a host country is a commitment for the long haul. Creating them provides partners an unambiguous demonstration of good faith from the United States in terms of funding, resources, and dedication to a goal. It also sets the clear expectation that the host country will meet and maintain U.S.-established training standards. Second, the host nation establishes itself as an operational expert from whom neighboring states can learn. Finally, CTCs re-emphasize the need to find local solutions to local problems, encouraging neighboring countries to achieve mutually beneficial outcomes through training and joint operations. Such centers potentially can reduce developing countries' reliance on larger states as enforcers of order in their territorial seas, shifting the bilateral dynamic in a more independent and equitable direction.

    That final point is critical, because training centers can accelerate the development of joint capabilities in countries with limited resources and numerous, insulated bureaucracies that limit operational effectiveness. CTCs dissolve historical mistrust between competing agencies by demonstrating the real benefits of working together with fellow maritime officers, whether it is border police, navy, customs, or natural resource conservation units. This outcome is well documented in the country of Malta, where counter-piracy operations in the Gulf of Aden with the Dutch navy and counternarcotics operations with Maltese police were facilitated by its own international maritime training center.

    Malta and Kenya in the Vanguard

    Because resources are always scarce for foreign engagement programs, site selection must be based on U.S. maritime security interests. Decisions should be guided by geography, regional political influence, and the host-nation's working relationship with the United States.

    Malta's strategic position in the Mediterranean Sea preserves its historic role as an island nation bridging two continents. Since the CTC is a cooperative enterprise, knowledgeable and reliable professionals from the host nation have to be available to conduct daily management of the center, including continuous outreach to participating countries. Malta has a small but effective and well-equipped armed force with a history of professionalism, including the excellent track record of its world-renowned Search and Rescue School. Most of its core competencies are maritime, because the Armed Forces of Malta has decades of significant expertise in maritime law enforcement and humanitarian missions. Participating countries feel comfortable learning from the Maltese, because they conduct similar-scale operations, are fluent English-speaking trainers, and their country is a perceived as a peaceful, law-abiding state.

    Partners should establish a charter with the regional combatant command focusing on areas of operational experience. That will ensure quality training in fields that are familiar to host-nation instructors, provide a venue to introduce and evaluate new subjects of instruction, and reduce pressure to take on topics outside an area of expertise. In 2009, the European and Africa commands encouraged Malta to establish a training center focusing on maritime safety and security issues. It responded with a proposal to teach courses on countering illegal immigration, narcotics smuggling, and terrorist networks at sea, with specific focus on non-EU countries in the Mediterranean and Black Sea regions.

    The resultant Maritime Safety and Security Training Center in Malta was inspired by the successful Search and Rescue School, which had been established in the 1990s with assistance from the U.S. Coast Guard and European Command's Counter-narcotics Trafficking Division. After training its own personnel, Malta began offering search-and-rescue and maritime-security courses to other Mediterranean countries in 2002; the European Command provided scholarships. To date, more than 60 students from 20 countries in Europe, Africa, and the Middle East have attended Malta's Search and Rescue School.6 Malta and the United States are now are capitalizing on that success by expanding the program into a comprehensive Cooperative Training Center, which now includes courses in law enforcement, search and rescue, intelligence, operational law, port security, and emergency response. Starting in 2014, the CTC annually will offer 13 courses for 260 students.

    Using Malta as an example, a notional curriculum for a fully functioning maritime CTC might look as follows:

    An excellent, comprehensive document regarding the organization and governance of a model CTC already exists. After an initial study by the Combined Joint Task Force-Horn of Africa and other partners in 2006, a Maritime Center of Excellence (MCE) was proposed during annual East Africa Southwest Indian Ocean Security Conferences.7 An agreement between Kenya and the Africa Command established the Maritime Center of Excellence at the Kenyan Port Authority's Bandari College in June 2009.8 The curriculum was developed by the Global Maritime and Transportation School of the U.S. Naval War College and Bandari College. Civilian professors and naval officers from the joint task force and the Kenyan navy are instructors. The center's co-director, a U.S. Navy commander, has said that the center's purpose is to promote stability and security in Africa. He noted that pilot courses of instruction provide training at the operational level for mid-grade maritime officers and their civilian counterparts. Overall, the goal is to help build relationships among African nations through maritime partnerships.9

    Africa Command's program meets nearly all requirements for a successful and effective CTC. The significant additional needs are more focused on junior-level student groups and course topics that provide tangible skills in maritime trades, i.e., small-boat seamanship, maritime boarding-officer qualifications, search-and-rescue coordination, and instructor development. The MCE expects an evolution of the curriculum over time, as African nations' maritime-safety and security needs and interests become more apparent.10 The CTC model emphasizes a curriculum that relies on a professionally trained coastal force equipped with reliable platforms maintained by skilled technicians. A formal assessment (incorporating the desired outcomes of State Department and Central Command's plans) should guide the nascent institution toward building a program that focuses on long-term, sustainable capabilities. Experience shows that such an effort can focus the combatant command's budget-prioritization process: Linking training dollars to specific security outcomes helps the center secure highly desired out-year funds.

    Our nation's international maritime security goals require creation of an enduring and self-sustaining capability in partner nations to maintain safe and secure seas. The National Maritime Strategy establishes "cooperative partnerships and alliances," through "a coordinated and consistent approach" as a fundamental requirement for that security. Presidential directives establish the State Department's leadership role. But the combatant commands' history of engagement and "deep pockets" mean they will continue to play a predominant role in implementing the Outreach Plan's maritime-security strategies. As illustrated in Malta and Kenya, U.S. sponsorship of host-nation, regional training centers make CTCs a powerful and constructive concept. They are a cost-effective and productive way to develop a country's ability to sustain effective maritime operations and facilitate cooperation and trust among countries operating in a shared maritime domain. They are worthy of long-term funding and support.



    1. http://fas.org/irp/offdocs/nspd/nspd41.pdf

    2. http://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/HSPD_IOCPlan.pdf

    3. http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2009/05/the-400-million-pakistan-fund-wh...

    4. http://www.southcom.mil/AppsSC/files/0UI0I1177092386.pdf

    http://www.pacom.mil/web/pacom_resources/pdf/PACOM%20STRATEGY%2002Apr09.pdf

    http://www.eucom.mil/english/mission.asp

    http://www.centcom.mil/en/about-centcom/our-mission/

    http://www.scribd.com/doc/19252132/United-States-Africa-Command-2009-Pos...

    http://www.jtfn.northcom.mil/subpages/vision.html

    5. "The Africa Partnership Station A New U.S. Approach to sub-Saharan Engagement," The International Institute for Strategic Studies (Vol. 14, Issue 6, August 2008).

    6. The complete list of countries is: Albania, Algeria, Bulgaria, Cameroon, Cape Verde, Croatia, Cyprus, Egypt, Equatorial Guinea, Israel, Cote d'Ivoire, Kenya, Libya, Montenegro, Mauritania, Nigeria, Tunisia, Ukraine, Saudi Arabia and the UK.

    7. http://www.hoa.africom.mil/getArticle.asp?art=3285

    8. http://www.hoa.africom.mil/getArticle.asp?art=3213

    9. http://www.usnwc.edu/pao/news.aspx?q=134

    10. http://www.usnwc.edu/pao/news.aspx?q=134

    Commander Schenk is currently deputy commander of Coast Guard Sector Lake Michigan, based in Milwaukee. He was stationed in Malta from 2007 to 2010 as the only diplomatically accredited Coast Guard attach

     

     

    Comment on Partnering to Safeguard the Seas Article

    Although I generally agree with CDR Schenk's proposal regarding the value of developing Cooperative Training Centers, I believe it is necessary to correct four (4) factual errors discussed in his article regarding the Section 1206 Global Train & Equip Authority, which can be found on page 55.

    The author is accurate in that the Section 1206 authority was initially funded at $100 million in 2006. However, for the subsequent fiscal years 2007-2008 and 2009-2011, it was authorized and appropriated for $300 million per year and $350 million per year, respectively. It has never received an appropriation for funding at $750 million.

    CDR Schenk also mentions that 1206 authorized uses include energy security and homeland forward defense proposals, which is not accurate. Per the FY 2009 NDAA, the 1206 authority authorizes DoD to utilize it to build the capacity of a foreign country's national military forces in order for that country to 1) conduct counterterrorism operations or 2) participate in or support military and stability operations in which the U.S. military are participating. Consequently, 1206 has never been employed for the purposes the author mentioned above.

    The author alludes to Section 1206 being a foreign policy tool to further bilateral relationships, similar to the State Department's Foreign Military Financing (FMF) Authority. However, unlike FMF, which considers the bilateral relationship as one aspect of its national security objectives, DoD's Section 1206 is distinct in that it only focuses on achieving national security objectives by directly supporting the Combatant Commander's requirement to build partner nation capacity in counterterrorism and stability operations activities. The FY10 NDAA House Armed Services Committee Report underscored this key difference as cited below:

    The committee recognizes that it has become an important tool for building partner capacity and security cooperation...However, as the committee has observed the execution and growth of this program over time, the committee has come to see a distinction between traditional foreign assistance-related authorities designed to assist a foreign country to meet what it perceives as its own national security requirements within the context of a larger United States foreign policy framework, and this new type of authority, which generally represents the Secretary of Defense's assessment of a combatant commander's need to build certain capacities in partner nations to satisfy specific theater security requirements.

    Lastly, CDR Schenk notes that DoD utilizes Section 1206 to procure mostly big-ticket equipment items to the detriment of smaller, "less-glamorous" projects. With over 110 approved projects since 2006, the vast majority are medium-to-small in scale & cost and focus on providing "easily absorbed" training and equipment (e.g. communications gear, individual soldier equipment, vehicles, surveillance gear, boats, etc).

    LCDR Sharif Calfee, USN

    Post new comment

    The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
    • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
    • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
    • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <p> <br>

    More information about formatting options

    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    Image CAPTCHA
    Enter the characters shown in the image.