VIEW PROCEEDINGS ARCHIVES

 

The Battleship Missouri and the Trumans
SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

When the Japanese delegation came aboard the ship to sign the terms of surrender on 2 September 1945, few if any of the Sailors and Allied dignitaries on deck realized how the site was selected. Here's what happened.

Some events in history are the result of careful planning, while others just sort of evolve through a series of steps that did not appear at first to be connected. The latter was the case with the selection of the battleship USS...

This Proceedings article is for members only.

If you are a member, please click here to sign in. If you are not a member, please join now and receive immediate access to this article.

October 2010 Comment & Discussion by David Buell (p. 84)

FADM William D. Leahy, USN (U.S. President Harry S. Truman's Chief of Staff) may have advocated for a US Navy Cimarron-Classs Fast Fleet Oiler for this reason:

  • >> The Imperial Japanese Navy could not maintain the operational tempo of U.S.Carrier groups because it did not have service ships capable of underway replenishment; an appropriate symbol for (WW II) victory in the Pacific would be a black hose between a carrier and a fleet oiler. <<
  • Williamson Murray and Alan Millett, “Innovation: Past and Future,” Military Innovation in the Interwar Period (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), pp. 348-49
  • Post new comment

    The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
    • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
    • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
    • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <p> <br>

    More information about formatting options

    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    Image CAPTCHA
    Enter the characters shown in the image.